When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Never miss anything again. Sign up for our RSS news feeds and Newsletters.
A NEW railway station, a 1,000-space car park and a waste recycling plant are posing a threat to the Green Belt north of Oxford, campaigners claim.
Ian Scargill of the Oxford Green Belt Network at the Water Eaton park-and-ride
Planning permission has been given to a 1.6-hectare waste centre between Oxford and Kidlington on the grain silo site alongside the A34.
However, a public inquiry in the summer will also consider the Chiltern Railways plan for a new station and car park at the same site, off Banbury Road.
It is thought highly unlikely both schemes could be squeezed on to the same site.
But locals fear both schemes could go ahead — with the waste plant and an existing aggregate dump moved to adjacent farmland.
And they are warning that the development could risk a building “free for all” in the narrow gap of Green Belt land separating Oxford and Kidlington.
Ian Scargill, chairman of Oxford Green Belt Network, was shocked that County Hall had granted Grundon Waste permission to build a plant expected to handle up to 150,00 tonnes of waste a year.
He said the decision comes only weeks after Chiltern Railways’ application to the Government’s Transport Secretary to build a station and car park.
The firm wants to build on the same site near the park-and-ride as part of a £250m package to create a new route from Oxford to London Marylebone.
The new station proposed on the 1940s grain silo site will serve Kidlington, Yarnton, North Oxford and the surrounding area.
A spokesman for Chiltern Railways said: “We believe that a station is a better option for this site. There is widespread support from the local community for this option.”
Chiltern Railways proposals will go before Cherwell District Council today. But the final decision will be made by the Transport Secretary.
Councillors are being warned that the existing aggregate dump would have to be relocated on to farmland to the north.
The report to councillors concludes: “The new parkway station with associated car parking is inappropriate development which will have an impact upon the character, appearance and openness of the Green Belt.
“However, it is considered that the harm is outweighed by the very special circumstances... the proposal will increase the Rail capacity along the Birmingham to London rail corridor, benefiting both passengers and freight.”
County Hall yesterday defended its decision to approve the waste centre on the site earmarked for the station.
Spokesman Owen Morton said: “The council’s planning and regulation committee considered the merits of the waste facility proposal very carefully, with the benefit of a full officer report explaining the reasons why there were very special circumstances for permitting this development in this green belt location.”
Find your next job now in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire now!
Search Now »
Oxfordshire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Comments (11)
11/03/10
Joe Cooke says...
11/03/10
JohnnyB says...
Why do these backward thinking groups always want to stand in the way of progress? Build it and build it soon!
11/03/10
online_reader says...
11/03/10
Andrew:Oxford says...
11/03/10
bigaldublin says...
I'm all for a greenbelt but I would much rather see a greenbelt that helped Oxford and it's environs in a sustainable way. I'd also rather see a parkway railway station in the North of the city that allows people from Witney, Woodstock, Chipping Norton etc to get trains to London or Birmingham/the North or MK and Cambridge when that link reopens. Having to crawl into Oxford to take a train is probably putting a lot of people off.
11/03/10
Tom Cranmer says...
11/03/10
melyn am byth says...
Jesus H, get on with it!
I live in Templar Road, North Oxford
11/03/10
Bogota Bob says...
Then they'll be out banging their little soapboxes about how its cost so much to deliver the scheme because they spent 200 years listening to NIMBY palookas
12/03/10
middleton kidlington says...
15/03/10
Pierre My says...
16/03/10
middleton kidlington says...