'Government plan should go up in smoke'

Jonathan McWilliam Jonathan McWilliam

Oxfordshire health bosses have been accused of pandering to the ‘nanny state’ by backing plans to sell cigarettes in unbranded packets.

NHS Oxfordshire, the county’s primary care trust, will be drumming up support for tobacco to be sold in green packets, in the city centre tomorrow.

The Government claims the non branded packs, which have been designed in an ‘unattractive olive green colour’, will deter children from smoking.

They could contain warning messages and images.

But Peter Wiblin, of West End News, in Bury Street, Abingdon, said the move will not work and instead force smokers underground.

He said: “It should not be up to the Government to dictate to the general public how to live their lives.

“It is typical of a load of goody gooders in favour of the nanny state.”

Mr Wiblin said the Government was already in the process of making shopkeepers cover up tobacco products behind white shutters so the public can not be tempted to buy them.

He claims the rules and regulations will kill the independent shop trader.

He said: “It’s a typical example of these people thinking they know what is best for us.

“Look at what the smoking ban did to the pubs.

“We have destroyed pubs, post offices, and now we are going to destroy the independent shopkeepers.”

Oxfordshire’s director of Public Health, Jonathan McWilliam, said the idea would be put to the public by representatives from NHS Oxfordshire in the city centre on Saturday.

He said: “The idea behind this proposal is to stop packaging itself acting as an advert to youngsters, tempting them into a highly-addictive habit that could seriously damage their health and lead to an early death.

“We urge people to participate in the consultation and make their views about plain packaging heard.”

The Government claim that the new legislation will help to discourage children from smoking by making tobacco packaging look less attractive.

The olive green colour has been picked because it is the least attractive, and officials also believe the plain packets will stop cigarette manufacturers creating false beliefs that some cigarettes are less harmful than others.

Dr McWilliam said brands which are marketed in shiny packs or as ‘super slims’ are particularly attractive to young women.

By introducing plain packaging, the health warnings will become bigger and more eye-catching against a plain background, he said.

Dr McWilliam added: “Quitting smoking is the single most important thing that smokers can do to improve their health.

“There are approximately 100,000 smokers in Oxfordshire and our view is that any sensible measure discouraging people is worthwhile for their health and that of those close to them.”

The Government’s consultation closes on 10 July.

Comments(7)

Andrew:Oxford says...
8:24pm Fri 8 Jun 12

If they were going to go for an undesirable colour, why on earth did they choose near enough the same colour as Harrods? It doesn't even take much googling to find an image of a packet of Harrods cigarettes to compare!

Maybe Harrods is no longer considered to be an aspirational brand...

mayjune says...
8:14am Sat 9 Jun 12

Crazy idea! The answer here is to invest in more ways to help the smoker quit! Kids copy so less smokers in the family must be beneficial to kids growing up!

Lord Palmerstone says...
8:47am Sat 9 Jun 12

The coalition is a dead duck. If all it does is authoritarian socialism then what's the point of it? It may be cheaper for the taxpayer for smokers to die before retirement. Let's have the figures so we can make an informed decision. By "we" I mean an actual Conservative administration

Porphyro says...
10:55am Sat 9 Jun 12

Lord Palmerstone wrote:
The coalition is a dead duck. If all it does is authoritarian socialism then what's the point of it? It may be cheaper for the taxpayer for smokers to die before retirement. Let's have the figures so we can make an informed decision. By "we" I mean an actual Conservative administration
I'm intrigued by Lord P's chronic misuse of "socialist" or "socialism" as a label of abuse whenever he mentions some aspect of social policy that he disapproves of. Similarly "clerk" has become a term of abuse in his idiosyncratic lexicon. Lord P makes Grumpy Old Men seem like benevolent and kindly favourite uncles by comparison.

xjohnx says...
3:45pm Sun 10 Jun 12

Lord Palmerstone wrote:
The coalition is a dead duck. If all it does is authoritarian socialism then what's the point of it? It may be cheaper for the taxpayer for smokers to die before retirement. Let's have the figures so we can make an informed decision. By "we" I mean an actual Conservative administration
What are you talking about?

Please think about going back to your own planet. Ours doesn't need you.

Dr bob is my hero says...
10:12pm Sun 10 Jun 12

Porphyro wrote:
Lord Palmerstone wrote:
The coalition is a dead duck. If all it does is authoritarian socialism then what's the point of it? It may be cheaper for the taxpayer for smokers to die before retirement. Let's have the figures so we can make an informed decision. By "we" I mean an actual Conservative administration
I'm intrigued by Lord P's chronic misuse of "socialist" or "socialism" as a label of abuse whenever he mentions some aspect of social policy that he disapproves of. Similarly "clerk" has become a term of abuse in his idiosyncratic lexicon. Lord P makes Grumpy Old Men seem like benevolent and kindly favourite uncles by comparison.
LP is right, if the government are so concerned about our health then they should ban tobacco, but until then and whilst it is still legal, and taxed, smokers should have the right to have places reserved for them. No taxation without representation.

Porphyro says...
10:33pm Sun 10 Jun 12

Dr bob etc - you seem muddled in your attempt to put together a coherent point. There is no logical inconsistency in the government recognising that smoking is bad for you yet upholding your personal right to smoke. As a non-smoker, I am pleased to be able to use pubs without my right to clean air being infringed by smokers. They do have places reserved for them - the open air. As for your last sentence, how does barking a slogan advance your case?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree