Education RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Oxford Academy's standards 'must rise'

Oxford Academy principal Mike Reading Oxford Academy principal Mike Reading

THE OXFORD Academy’s principal says he has set tough new targets for the school, after results fell below the Government’s minimum GCSE targets.

Mike Reading said he wanted 100 per cent of pupils to make the expected rates of progress in English and maths, based on a starting point of their Key Stage Two results. Last year the percentages were 38 and 54.

The academy, which converted from Peers School in 2008, was the only secondary in the county whose results fell below Government targets.

Just 28 per cent of youngsters achieved five A* to C grades at GCSE, including English and maths.

Mr Reading said attainment among youngsters coming into the school was so low that only by all the students making their expected progress would GCSE results be above the Government’s 2012 minimum target of 40 per cent of pupils achieving five good GCSEs, including English and maths.

Nationally, the average is 70 per cent, and no county school currently achieves 100 per cent.

Mr Reading said: “I am not going to turn round and say these are a good set of results.

“They demonstrated that we are here for the long haul.

“That means making sure we make progress, but it does take time to make things happen.”

The school’s results were the 25th worst in England.

Results fell two percentage points from 2010, but remain above the 18 per cent achieved by Peers School in its final year.

The 800-pupil academy in Littlemore already runs a Year Seven programme which provides catch-up for first-year pupils who need extra help.

Mr Reading said boosting literacy levels was his key focus.

He said: “We know weak areas that need improving, and we know improvement can be made.

“Absolutely central to that is giving our children greater confidence in literacy.

“By that I mean the old- fashioned abilities to read well, speak well and write well. That should not only happen in English lessons. It is something we are saying, and Ofsted is saying, should be part of everything we do.”

He added: “In other subjects we need to develop outstanding practice, and give teachers increasing confidence to learn how to go from being good to outstanding.”

Just 19 per cent of low achievers and 50 per cent of high achievers aged 11 made the expected progress in English by the time they sat GCSEs.

Mr Reading said the curriculum would be rearranged next year to provide extra time for core subjects like English and maths. Maths results improved in 2011, with the percentage of students gaining A* to C increasing from 28 per cent to 57 per cent. That followed a challenge from Ofsted to improve maths teaching two years ago.

Mr Reading said: “We have set ourselves challenging goals and are confident that we will demonstrate further successes.”

Comments(15)

cb1917 says...
7:49pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Now when Michael Gove tells us that Academies are the answer to all the problems in education we know that he has not got a clue. Those who think that the fragmentation and privatisation of schools can improve attainment, results and progress have been fooled.

Mr Reading has set 'challenging goals' but what he does not mention is the effect this is having on his staff.
Why are they trying to leave his school as fast as they can?

Mr Gove wants to fast track the dismissal of poor performing teachers. Well what he really needs to do is fast track the dismissal of Mr Reading ...who is on a salary of £100k plus!! His TAs are on£15k at the most!!

Oxford Male says...
8:39pm Fri 27 Jan 12

If he is really on £100k given the performance of the Academy this is a scandal. Even if it did well that salary seems rather ott to me. Shouldn't he be sacked?

Milkbutnosugarplease says...
9:24pm Fri 27 Jan 12

As a former secondary-level teacher, I know that there aren't enough good headteachers to go around. Many are poor and surround themselves with poor deputy heads, so a school has no effective leadership. This man saying he's set targets sounds the alarm bell for me - why hadn't he set them long ago when he got the job and can he motivate his staff to achieve these goals? Talking to the press is easy but making things happen among 800 students is more difficult.

freddyjames says...
9:34pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Talking to many parents in the area the problem might not just be the teaching of the pupils but the ability to control the bullies that make life hard for many in the school that want to succeed. Perhaps a harder stance and a reality check for the school on the issue would help.

mary20 says...
9:39pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Last year when an other set of " challenging targets" were set, staff started to drop like flies "with stress". The bigest problem is the behaviour of the kids. They are so bad that some of them are unteachable. The management does not do anything about it. Of course it is easier to pressure teachers rather than do something about the behaviour. What can we expect when pupils can tell their principal and teachers to f... off and do not get excluded.
100k is far too much for leaders who do not have a clue.

freddyjames says...
10:10pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Perhaps the school need to start listening to the parents of children that have, and in cases are still suffering from this sort of abuse. I could not imagine the hurt it causes to those who are suffering and are still expected to attend the school.

Fishbowl123 says...
10:16pm Fri 27 Jan 12

As an ex student of the academy I cannot believe that Mr Reading earns that much money! All my teachers seemed under a lot of pressure and were not as passionate about their subjects as they used to be. The only time we EVER saw Mr Reading was when he was showing visitors around the school. He showed no interest in who we were or who we could be, we were just simply grades on a piece of paper.

freddyjames says...
10:40pm Fri 27 Jan 12

If you ever had a problem years ago the parent could get to see the head of the school as he would know about each student and show an interest. Wonder if Mr Reading is available to speak to or is he just busy counting the numbers.

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
4:12am Sat 28 Jan 12

Now that schools are judges solely on a league table, what do you expect the head to be concerned about. These silly ratings have done nothing to improve things, and shift the fundamental from an all round education, to just teaching enough to pass the required mark. I would gamble a guess that the staff at Cherwell are no better or worse than those at Peers, but are lucky enough to have a different class of pupil for whom their education does not stop at the school gates. What the government needs to do is stop pussyfooting around with pupils who do not give a F**K and totally separate them from the ones that want to learn. You can't blame the Head when he is faced with a situation where half of the teaching time is spent trying to stop the classroom resembling a warzone. Teach those that want to be educated, and punish those that do not want to be. Not as it is now where the interested pupils are punished by bullying and having their class time decimated by the action of quite a few morons.

Darkforbid says...
11:19am Sat 28 Jan 12

First Police Academy now School Academy, the comedy continues...

Jackie78 says...
12:51pm Sat 28 Jan 12

I don't think it can be called 'comedy' if students and staff are unhappy. Behaviour is only part of the problem. The results will not improve until students feel valued and staff can do theirjob without feeling under pressure. I'm sure Cherwell teachers are under the same pressure to deliver results but I would hazard a guess that they feel more supported. Things won't improve if the leadership separates itself from the rest of the staff through hostility.

mary20 says...
4:40pm Sat 28 Jan 12

The first year imprved results of the academy were the result of the hard work that Lorna Caldicot had done the year before the take over. Since then the managment has behaved like headless chickens with different policies and staff structures almost every term.

Thinkingoutloud says...
1:14pm Sun 29 Jan 12

What I am not clear about is where the academy goes from here. It was forced to leave the local authority control and is now an academy. It cannot go back to being under local authority control so is it stuck reporting direct to the government? If so then this is a failing of the government who think that academies are the answer to everything in schools. Where does the acaedmy get support and help from or is it just left on its own. If it does just wither away (as parents move their children to other academies) then what a terrible waste of Millions of pounds on new buildings (and big pay rise for the headteacher - as always)
I am starting to feel that Mr Gove is just throwing millions at every new academy or free school but, as this shows, it doesn't change a thing. The school is little better than when it was under local authority control when a lot less money was spent on it. Not particulalry good value for money is it.

freddyjames says...
10:57pm Sun 29 Jan 12

All we can do is hope that the school start to listen to parents and pupils. We all want for our children to receive an education in a safe and violent free environment. The school on all levels have to admit there is a problem within the school and start to deal with before it gets too late and to much damage is done

Darkforbid says...
4:22pm Tue 31 Jan 12

The problem with public schools is unlike private schools they haven't realised you teach kids to pass any test to get their chosen profession. Anything else is pointless.

click2find

Most popular