Letters RSS Feed


Smaller flood schemes

Sir – As you reported on Christmas Eve, the Environment Agency has announced that the flood protection scheme, to protect Oxford from floods so severe they only occur once every 75 years, has been postponed indefinitely. Disappointing, but not surprising: it always seemed doubtful whether this ambitious and expensive scheme would materialise.

That is why for the past two years the Oxford Flood Alliance has urged lesser, but earlier, action. The Environment Agency and Oxford city have responded positively and much work was done last year. Thames Water and the Vale of White Horse District Council have contributed to local schemes. Despite this progress (and even without the possible adverse effects of climate change) flooding still poses a very serious risk to the city of Oxford. Much more needs to be done — that, of course, is why the big scheme was developed. Some future floods will dwarf those seen in recent years. With the big scheme now on indefinite hold we hope to develop, with the authorities, a medium-term flood strategy for Oxford.

We have already identified nine or ten measures across the area which, while not yet costed, we believe can be achieved at a fraction of the £100-150m that was projected for the big scheme. These measures would further reduce flood risk, keeping water flowing through the floodplain rather than accumulating, and helping to keep people dry from all but the most extreme events.

We believe that everyone — the agencies mentioned, the county council, and Oxford’s civic bodies — will want to pull together on this. We are optimistic that our politicians, both locally and nationally, will agree that the necessary money will be money well spent, so that the threat facing many thousands of homes and hundreds of businesses in Oxford is reduced.

Dr Peter Rawcliffe, Oxford Flood Alliance

Comments(1)

RichardRogers says...
10:58am Fri 15 Jan 10

Dear Sir,
Last October in a local park, at midday on a Saturday, a friend of my daughter was punched in the head and had a knife held to his throat before being robbed by a gang of teenagers. The chief culprit was sentenced last week: the knife was confiscated and he was fined just over £200. The others received nothing.

Apparently the maximum prison sentence for the offence of merely carrying such a weapon, for an adult, is 4 years. For a 14-16 year-old they can be sent to a young offenders’ institution. In this case the boy’s sentence, far from being a deterrent, can only act as an incentive.

The message must surely be: carry a knife and carry out a couple of robberies every now and then. Think about it - the chances are you won’t get caught, and if you target the right person you’re more or less guaranteed cash, a mobile phone, an MP3 player, a rush of the legal drug adrenalin and masses of ‘respect’ from your peers. And if by some miracle you get caught for one of the crimes, the £200 fine will be more than covered. All for just a few minutes’ work a week.

And the government is accused of not doing enough to stimulate youth employment!

Yours faithfully,
Richard Rogers

78 Harpes Road
Oxford OX2 7QL
Home tel: 01865 453608
Work tel: 01865 510062

click2find

Most popular