Leader 'can't guarantee this won't cost council taxpayers' (From The Oxford Times)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Leader 'can't guarantee this won't cost council taxpayers'
9:00am Saturday 9th February 2013 in News
THE leader of Oxford City Council said last night he could not guarantee taxpayers’ money would not be spent on reducing the size of the student blocks.
Bob Price said: “I can’t guarantee anything at this stage.
“Any proposition that comes back from these talks will have to go to full council for a decision.
“But in terms of financial availability it [reducing the buildings’ height] would be very expensive.”
Mr Price said that although the development did not interrupt the views of the city, he did not find it attractive.
He said: “It does look different from what I expected.
“I think it is a rather unattractive design. The building materials are very stark and aggressive, and it does not blend in at all with the environment.”
However, he said that he did not regret the council’s decision to grant planning permission, and that nothing had gone wrong in the decision-making process.
He added: “What has happened is that you see the drawings on a map or a plan, then you see a photographic representation and take a judgment because you think that looks okay.
“But when it is first built then it is a much more stark and immediate prospect.
“People make judgments on all sorts of things and find out it is not what they thought it was.
“It is very clear that the application was very minutely described and was fully considered but it was a matter of judgment and the difference between that judgment and reality is a cause for concern.
“I am happy with the process, but not necessarily the decision because it has provoked a regrettable public reaction.”
Comments(7)
faatmaan
says...
9:58am Sat 9 Feb 13
Dilligaf2010
says...
10:50am Sat 9 Feb 13
faatmaan wrote:One hour ago in news;- http://www.oxfordmai
and the oxford mail could state where these blocks are !
l.co.uk/news/1021785
5.__1m_U_turn__Call_
to_take_two_storeys_
off_building/
It's not a new story, only took me a few seconds to search
Grunden Skip
says...
2:46am Sun 10 Feb 13
Cathena wrote:But most like these, do not make sense and waste our money. Just let them (The Uni) carry on with the buildings, they hurt nobody but the greenies that have million pound homes near the meadow are care for nothing but themselves and their property value. For God's sake the RED BRICK HOUSES at the Wolvecote end of the meadow are far more ugly and are right on the meadow, yet no complaints there. could it be that some of the the protesters live there?
The council could try listening to comments from the locals - some of them actually make sense.
Geoff Roberts
says...
12:02am Mon 11 Feb 13
Right, sure. Even if that were true it wouldn't matter because local communities matter, full stop. As for the red brick houses (all in CAPS): they don't tower above the meadow and trees. Not sure why I'm bother to point all this out because you'll just go with your fantasy version of things.
And this from Bob Price:
“What has happened is that you see the drawings on a map or a plan, then you see a photographic representation and take a judgment because you think that looks okay.
“But when it is first built then it is a much more stark and immediate prospect."
The man is incompetent. "Oops, I didn't realise it'd look like that".
Grunden Skip
says...
3:35pm Mon 11 Feb 13
Geoff Roberts wrote:All plans look great in the artists impression, so what is your point. This went through all democratic channels, and the protesters did not give a **** then. The Wolvecote RED BRICK HOUSES are more of an eyesore as they back right onto the meadow, this Uni development is next to three others and is not on the meadow. But as we all know Geoff you are always right, so lets leave it there.
"the greenies that have million pound homes near the meadow are care for nothing but themselves and their property value"
Right, sure. Even if that were true it wouldn't matter because local communities matter, full stop. As for the red brick houses (all in CAPS): they don't tower above the meadow and trees. Not sure why I'm bother to point all this out because you'll just go with your fantasy version of things.
And this from Bob Price:
“What has happened is that you see the drawings on a map or a plan, then you see a photographic representation and take a judgment because you think that looks okay.
“But when it is first built then it is a much more stark and immediate prospect."
The man is incompetent. "Oops, I didn't realise it'd look like that".
Hafiz Ladell
says...
10:06am Tue 12 Feb 13
Cathena says...
9:52am Sat 9 Feb 13