Quarter of Oxford's children now living in poverty (From The Oxford Times)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Quarter of Oxford's children now living in poverty
9:00am Thursday 21st February 2013 in News
By Jamie Brooks, Contact me on 01865 425422
Buy this photo »
Sarah Darby, joint manager of the Barton Advice Centre Pictures: Jon Lewis
THE number of children classed as living in poverty has risen to a quarter of all youngsters in Oxford, new research shows.
The study by the Campaign to End Child Poverty found 8,345 children in the city were living in poverty.
It showed poverty rates in the city had increased by three percentage points, from 22 per cent in 2011 to 25 per cent in 2012.
The figure is higher than the national average of 20.2 per cent.
Staff at advice centres said that the findings were not surprising, but reacted with disappointment.
Carole Roberts, of Rose Hill and Donnington Advice Centre, said: “Things are just getting worse at the moment. It is absolutely disgusting in a city like Oxford that one child in four is living below the poverty line.
“We are having more and more families visiting us with debt problems. It is getting to be a nightmare.
“It is about time that people in this city told the Government that enough is enough. We will be getting soup kitchens next because food banks won’t be able to cope with it all.”
Sarah Darby, joint manager of Barton Advice Centre, agreed, saying: “We have definitely experienced an increase in families visiting and that will only get worse over the next few months. But I am surprised the figure is that high.”
Suzy Drohan, fellow joint manager of Barton Advice Centre, added: “This could make the situation worse, especially when the level of support to children is not being increased.
“In an affluent city like Oxford, for a quarter of children to be identified as in poverty is outrageous.
“The use of food banks has gone from something which was exceptional to something which is fairly average.
“It is the squeeze on working-age people that is unfortunately making child poverty increase.”
The research was published by the Campaign to End Child Poverty, a group of more than 100 charities which tackles the issue across the UK.
Cowley-based Oxfam is among the charities which support the campaign. Those classed as living below the poverty line belong to two groups.
The first is defined as children in households with below 60 per cent of the median national income of £26,500 before housing costs. That means households who are working, but earning less than £16,000 a year before housing.
The second group is those whose parents do not work and are in a family which is in receipt of out-of-work benefits.
To calculate the percentage figure, the two groups are added together and divided by the total number of children in the area to work out the average.
The city is split – with 27 per cent of children in the Oxford East constituency living in poverty compared to only 12 per cent in Oxford West and Abingdon.
Meanwhile, though child poverty in general across Oxfordshire is below the national average, it is on the increase in every district (see graphic).
More than 16,000 children in the county are defined as living in poverty according to the report.
Comments(12)
zimmer, Wolvecote.
says...
1:12pm Thu 21 Feb 13
bart-on simpson
says...
1:19pm Thu 21 Feb 13
Anyone think the definition of "poverty" is a bit wide-of-the mark? £16K before housing costs.
Is not child poverty to do with the parent's poverty first and foremost, and that largely relates to being in work or not, so why does Oxfam object to the 60 jobs that come with the Audi car dealership on the Oxford Business Park?
jamiek
says...
1:53pm Thu 21 Feb 13
zimmer, Wolvecote.
says...
2:32pm Thu 21 Feb 13
jamiek wrote:Because Jamiek, in our perverted city, they look North of Cornmarket and see people with £million houses, £70k Jags, Mercs, and BMW's, spending £100+ on a meal out, and think that is how normal hard working people should be able to live. But the irony IS, that is their hard work that pays for those luxuries of their bosses, and they can have not even a taste of it, because the same bosses pay them minimum wage to keep both sets in the same position. It is a good old British tradition dating back to the middle ages, just a modern version of Serfdom really
People's idea of child poverty is them not having the latest42ins plasma tv or latest Xbox games its funny how most of these parents can still find money for fags booze and latest iPhones and Chav designer clothes
Andrew:Oxford
says...
5:36pm Thu 21 Feb 13
zimmer, Wolvecote. wrote:It must have been a while since you visited East Oxford...
jamiek wrote:Because Jamiek, in our perverted city, they look North of Cornmarket and see people with £million houses, £70k Jags, Mercs, and BMW's, spending £100+ on a meal out, and think that is how normal hard working people should be able to live. But the irony IS, that is their hard work that pays for those luxuries of their bosses, and they can have not even a taste of it, because the same bosses pay them minimum wage to keep both sets in the same position. It is a good old British tradition dating back to the middle ages, just a modern version of Serfdom really
People's idea of child poverty is them not having the latest42ins plasma tv or latest Xbox games its funny how most of these parents can still find money for fags booze and latest iPhones and Chav designer clothes
It's full of BMWs - all leased through the employee scheme of a local major employer. Brand new car every 6 months at a very keen rate inclusive of insurance.
Oflife
says...
6:10pm Thu 21 Feb 13
Tom Cranmer
says...
11:44pm Thu 21 Feb 13
h councils. However, any receipts above the baseline will be weighted in favour of the collecting authority, which should encourage growth. However, the only way authorities can really encourage business investment is through infrastructure development and new business parks etc. In Oxford, we're running out of space for development.
Tom Cranmer
says...
11:57pm Thu 21 Feb 13
gymrat34
says...
4:03am Fri 22 Feb 13
Isawyoucoming
says...
12:48pm Fri 22 Feb 13
Lord Palmerstone
says...
2:21pm Fri 22 Feb 13
Isawyoucoming wrote:Cuts, what cuts? Have you not noticed the government is borrowing more than ever and we are in mega-debt? "Cuts"=not cuts. "Poverty"= someone on Rodeo Drive Beverley Hills earning less than $250,000 a year-why? Because old Lefty Humpty Dumpty says it is so.
come april the cuts will really take effect and make the situation worse
Of course poverty is a real word. It means not having a roof over your head; not knowing when you'll next eat. Believe me, we would not be being swamped by immigrants in our city if we had poverty. The immigrants come from places where a quarter of children are living in actual poverty, not "poverty"
Myron Blatz says...
9:33am Thu 21 Feb 13