Parents object to bid to merge schools

Parents object to bid to merge schools Parents object to bid to merge schools

SOME parents are worried that merging an Oxford primary school from two sites to one will badly affect their children.

Year 1 and 2 pupils at SS Mary and John Primary School currently study at the Irving Building in Hertford Street, while the remaining year groups are based at the former Isis Middle School in Meadow Lane.

Governors will vote on Monday, March 25, on a plan to have all 360 pupils at the Meadow Lane site, but that has drawn objections from some parents.

They fear the school will no longer be able to give its youngest pupils a gentle transition from Comper Foundation School, which is on the Hertford Street site, to primary school.

They are also worried what might ultimately happen to the Hertford Street site.

Dominic Woodfield, 42, who has a child at Comper, said: “The governors have not presented a convincing case. It seems as if they have made a decision based on administrative convenience rather than what is in the best interests of the children.

“At the moment they have this almost intermediate school facility where children have a nice, gentle unthreatening transition from Comper into the Irving Building, then on to Meadow Lane.”

Ace North, 33, from Percy Street, who has a son in Year 1, said: “This really seemed like a great set-up for children and I just can’t imagine how it could be so carefully managed if Key Stage 1 is in Meadow Lane.”

Dan Poore, 45 of Hertford Street, has older children, now 15 and 24, who previously attended the school.

He said: “Both of my daughters benefited a lot from being on that smaller site with a group of younger children. Without a school that area will be changed potentially very significantly.”

Governors insisted the decision was in the best interests of the children.

Chairman Petronella Spivey said: “Their education is adversely affected by the fact we are on two sites. Not all children have access every day to the headteacher, to the special needs co-ordinator, and or to things like the the wildlife garden and the IT room.

“Their experience is fragmented. We do need to look very carefully at the transition and how it would be managed.”

Comments(9)

toots89 says...
12:23pm Fri 15 Mar 13

I will be really dissapointed if the govenors choose to go ahead with this plan. I am an ex pupil, and long term resident of East Oxford and this is NOT what we want at all! The school have been really misleading with the info they have provided parents, including a letter which stated ALL teaching staff agree with the proposal, which is not true. Alot of parents are also under the impression that the school is a listed building, which it isnt! Anyone could buy the site, and potentially build what they like on it! Most likely student accomodation, or a housing development! This is not good for our community at all!

Andrew:Oxford says...
1:02pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Surely it is better to have all the children in one location so there is no need for any form of "transition".

That way they are part of a community from their very first day at school.

As always for Oxford the true issue will be that there may be competition for "my" parking space if there is redevelopment.

bknuts says...
1:36pm Fri 15 Mar 13

With the current set-up the smaller children are at the heart of a community, and I feel safer knowing that there are bakers, barbers, shop keepers around who know me and know my child. The transition from Comper is made easier by the fact that a favoured teacher or a younger friend is still there every day - albeit at the other side of the fence. Besides, in a bigger unit there is always the risk that the more timid children will simple become "invisible." The Meadow Lane site is not only at the edge of a field (rather than within the community) but also on a flood plain - how clever is that! One of the governors replied to my concerns by saying that they "have a very nice pub.."!

chavster says...
3:01pm Fri 15 Mar 13

"One of the governors replied to my concerns by saying that they "have a very nice pub.."!

Would that be the Chester Arms perchance, which has been closed for ages. Shows how much in touch the school governors are!

Echinoderm says...
3:20pm Fri 15 Mar 13

This sounds like such a bad idea. Please don't do this governors. At least don't fool yourselves that it would be better for the kids, it patently would be worse.. The current system is really rather special and should be celebrated, not given up!

rainshadow says...
3:35pm Fri 15 Mar 13

If it is the best interests of the children, why does the comper school next door oppose it? They know a bit about early years education surely... Apparently, the governors didn't even bother to look into the educational benefits of the Hertford Street arrangement - so what is Ms Spivey basing her claims on? This is a very poor show and should be exposed to full scrutiny

toots89 says...
8:05pm Fri 15 Mar 13

'' Surely it is better to have all the children in one location so there is no need for any form of "transition".''

Well that is the point, all the children WONT be on one site. Foundation year will still be based at comper, so that makes the 'transition' even worse! They go from being in, what is basically a nursery, to being thrown into a massive school full of big kids. It would cost far too much, and take up too much space to move foundation year to Meadow lane as well!
And as for parking space, we struggle for parking spaces anyway on Hertford street, what with the 4 cars per student household!
I am also interested to know how they decided that students education is being adversly affected by being on a split sight! Surely OFSTED would of picked up on that if it were true! I would say the opposite, that it is BETTER for them to have their 'own' teachers and teaching assistants constantly on hand, rather than having to share them with the entire school!

Len Banks says...
9:39pm Fri 15 Mar 13

What irritates me as a former school governor myself is the number of people who are prepared to sit on their backsides and winge about things without doing a finger to help their local school. People should realise that governors are unpaid volunteers, and some of them put in hour after hour of their own time as a service to the community.

I don't know much about this school, except what I've read in Oxford Mail reports -- that not long ago it was a failing school in special measures and it's been turned around thanks to the efforts of dedicated staff, an inspiring head, and a committed team of governors.

toots89 says...
10:02pm Fri 15 Mar 13

It was brought out of special measures with the help of the new head teacher, the staff and govenors are the same ones who watched it go into special measures in the first place. Its hard to get involved with the school when no one is telling anyone anything. Teachers have hardly uttered a word about this move to anyong, let alone staff, nothing obvious on their website about it unless you know about it in the first place, and a completely misleading letter saying all teaching staff support the move, when actually they dont!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree