Rail bosses to bridge the gap between South Hinksey and Oxford

A BRIDGE for pedestrians linking South Hinksey and Oxford will not be demolished without a replacement, Network Rail has pledged.

The rail company has promised not to demolish Hinksey Bridge without constructing a replacement after a planning row forced it to think again about providing disabled ramps.

The company wants to build the new bridge connecting South Hinksey and Oxford because the current one is too low for the overhead wires which need to be installed as part of the electrification of the line.

Plans for the replacement bridge were thrown out by Oxford City Council because the designs did not include any ramps for the disabled and those with pushchairs.

City council officers warned that Network Rail could appeal the decision and after the meeting a spokesman said the company was considering “all options”.

But Network Rail spokesman Sam Kelly has said the company will not demolish the bridge without a replacement, despite the fact that the company can do so without seeking planning approval.

The company says it has only been given the funding for a like-for-like replacement of the bridge and that disabled ramps could, in theory, be added at a later date.

Related links

Under the Oxford and Rugby Railways Act 1845, Network Rail does not have to seek planning permission to replace Hinksey Bridge, but merely needs “prior approval”.

Prior approval is decided on narrower grounds than a normal planning application.

These grounds are that the development ought to be and could be reasonably carried out elsewhere and that the design of the bridge would “injure the amenity of the neighbourhood” and could be modified to avoid such injury.

South Hinksey resident Peter Rawcliffe, who has been campaigning for ramps on the new bridge, said: “I am pleased Network Rail has given the undertaking not to simply demolish the bridge.”

City councillor John Tanner, who was on the planning committee which refused the prior approval, said: “I am very pleased Network Rail has said this.

“It would be outrageous if they were to knock the bridge down without replacing it.

“Lets hope this is the first step towards getting a modern bridge with access for wheelchairs and prams.

“Network Rail needs the cooperation of the city council to electrify the rail line and we all want to see that happen, but it is daft to put up a new bridge which is a replica from the 1940s.”

Comments(13)

Myron Blatz says...
10:23pm Sat 23 Mar 13

For a body which is heavily involved in transportation mobility, Network Rail should be publicly shamed into providing EQUAL ACCESS TO ALL PEOPLE NOT JUST THE ABLE-BODIED - and would Network Rail be allowed by the Government to show such levels of blatant discrimination, if this was deemed a 'racial issue' in this supposedly 'enlightened' age in which we supposedly have fought for? The real issue isn't about adequate bridge access for the disabled and those with mobility issues at the South Hinksey-Oxford location, but about Network Rail making such such provision in the rest of Oxfordshire and the Country.

Sandy Wimpole-Smythe says...
11:28am Sun 24 Mar 13

Myron Blatz wrote:
For a body which is heavily involved in transportation mobility, Network Rail should be publicly shamed into providing EQUAL ACCESS TO ALL PEOPLE NOT JUST THE ABLE-BODIED - and would Network Rail be allowed by the Government to show such levels of blatant discrimination, if this was deemed a 'racial issue' in this supposedly 'enlightened' age in which we supposedly have fought for? The real issue isn't about adequate bridge access for the disabled and those with mobility issues at the South Hinksey-Oxford location, but about Network Rail making such such provision in the rest of Oxfordshire and the Country.
Or it maybe political correctness gone too far. In reality how many disabled people REALLY want or need to use this bridge. Just because we can (in this case build a bridge for everyone) doesn't always mean we should.

Manor Born says...
12:29pm Sun 24 Mar 13

Have you ever been down Devil's Backbone? It's bumpy, narrow & unlit at night. Anyone in a wheelchair would be made to go down there - it's one of the least wheelchair friendly lanes in Oxford. With the General Elliot shut, the only people who use the bridge are villagers and ramblers. You also have to question where the ramps would go, there isn't room for them either side of the bridge

Manor Born says...
12:30pm Sun 24 Mar 13

Made? *Mad*

wend says...
2:03pm Sun 24 Mar 13

Have to agree with Manor Born. Perhaps Myron would like to visit the area and come up with a viable plan for the bridge. The steps are steep enough now let alone when the bridge has to be made higher. There just doesn't appear to be enough space unless Myron can see another solution

King Joke says...
4:15pm Sun 24 Mar 13

A few clarifications:

1. The Devil's Backbone has recently been resurfaced, and is now perfectly passable by wheelchair.

2. Ramps would not only enable wheelchair access but cycle access. Cycling from S Hinksey to Oxford currently entails either:

2.1 Lifting your bike up the steps which will be even higher when the bridge is raised, or:

2.2 A grim ride on a cycle path by the A34, which is bumpy as hell and strewn with broken glass from vehicle collisions.

3. THere is plent of room for ramps on both sides of the railway. NR recently built ramped bridges at Charlbury and Honeybourne because they legally had to - the ramps double back on themselves so don't take up much space. On the country side the ramps would be on the scrub land by Hinksey Sidings. On the town side they would have to be on piers in the lake, like the current footbridge is.

wend says...
5:03pm Sun 24 Mar 13

King joke - you've got a point there but would it not be a massive undertaking building piers and ramps over the lake? Agree land on the other side could be used. Having said that though - isn't the path extremely narrow once you're across the bridge. It's been quite a while since I was there but I'm sure some parts are narrow, sodden and very bumpy. It would be good if NR did build a proper all-user bridge but won't hold my breath.

Myron Blatz says...
9:26pm Sun 24 Mar 13

And yet we now expect and get 'kneeling buses' to enable those in wheelchairs, who use walking frames, and parents with babies and small children in push-chairs to travel on public transport, and disabled acces to public buildings and public areas - well, except City Council's Bonn Square, which seems to have been designed for super-fit rock climbers! The odd thing about people who moan against provision for disabled and those with push-chairs, is that when they or someone in their family needs such access, they are the first to loudly remonstrate about how 'we pays our Council Taxes' and why they won't be voting for their local City or County Councillor - even if they knew who it was, of course!

davidrnewman says...
12:58am Mon 25 Mar 13

I have lifted my bike up all those steps and taken it across. It is a useful route from those of us living in Donnington.

Wouldn't a spiral ramp fit easily into the space?

And is the bridge part of the premises of Network Rail to which the Disability Discrimination Act applies?

King Joke says...
8:39am Mon 25 Mar 13

Wend, you're right, that's what the DB used to be like, but it was resurfaced a couple of years ago to a high standard. It never was too narrow for a wheelchair, but now it has a suitable surface as well.

I'm no civil engineer so I can't comment on the ease of building over the lake. THere is even a narrow strip of land between the up fast line and the lake you could put ramps on, you may not need to build over the lake that much.

My fear is we spend months wearing down NR and are finally victorious, only for some moaning w anchor to object to the ramps because they don't like the look of them out of their back window, or shock horror, from the bowls club.

wend says...
2:56pm Mon 25 Mar 13

I would love to see a good all-user bridge PLUS a properly constructed path from the lake all the way to the ex general Elliott but would ask who would be responsible for maintaining the bridge/ramps/paths? At the moment walkers and cyclists are left to their own devices when the paths are icy and slippery, we can choose not to use the path. However if the ramps are icy who will grit them bearing in mind that the pavements are rarely if ever gritted in icy weather so a sloping ramp would very probably be extremely hazardous to negotiate. I'm not a dissenter at all, I would like to see ramps because I find the steps quite steep but somebody has to fund this both construction and maintenance. Could funding be provided from charity/lottery sources?

King Joke says...
3:18pm Mon 25 Mar 13

Mr Fed Up.

It wouldn't surprise me if no wheelchair users ever cross the bridge - because it's impossible for them to do so! Ditto pushchair users; although I have seen them lift pushchairs up the steps, a lot of parents use those rucksack things you put children in.

There is some fair demand from cyclists.

How do you really gauge demand, though, until the facility is there?

I don't see what you're getting at regarding the railway project - the electrified railway will go ahead regardless, this campaign will hardly stop it, just add a bit of cost - probably around £1m. NR's annual budget is something like £7bn.

It will cost far less than the County Council is spending on hamburgerisation of the Hinksey Hill and Kennington roundabouts.

Wend, I will re-re-iterate, the Devil's Backbone has a decent surface now, and the bridge over the Eynsham AC lake has high-grip pads on the approach ramps.

wend says...
4:06pm Mon 25 Mar 13

King Joke - thanks for that, I didn't realise the path was resurfaced all the way to the Elliott. Once the weather improves we may go walking there again.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree