Rail bosses to bridge the gap between South Hinksey and Oxford (From The Oxford Times)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Rail bosses to bridge the gap between South Hinksey and Oxford
7:00pm Saturday 23rd March 2013 in News By Dan Hearn
A BRIDGE for pedestrians linking South Hinksey and Oxford will not be demolished without a replacement, Network Rail has pledged.
The rail company has promised not to demolish Hinksey Bridge without constructing a replacement after a planning row forced it to think again about providing disabled ramps.
The company wants to build the new bridge connecting South Hinksey and Oxford because the current one is too low for the overhead wires which need to be installed as part of the electrification of the line.
Plans for the replacement bridge were thrown out by Oxford City Council because the designs did not include any ramps for the disabled and those with pushchairs.
City council officers warned that Network Rail could appeal the decision and after the meeting a spokesman said the company was considering “all options”.
But Network Rail spokesman Sam Kelly has said the company will not demolish the bridge without a replacement, despite the fact that the company can do so without seeking planning approval.
The company says it has only been given the funding for a like-for-like replacement of the bridge and that disabled ramps could, in theory, be added at a later date.
Under the Oxford and Rugby Railways Act 1845, Network Rail does not have to seek planning permission to replace Hinksey Bridge, but merely needs “prior approval”.
Prior approval is decided on narrower grounds than a normal planning application.
These grounds are that the development ought to be and could be reasonably carried out elsewhere and that the design of the bridge would “injure the amenity of the neighbourhood” and could be modified to avoid such injury.
South Hinksey resident Peter Rawcliffe, who has been campaigning for ramps on the new bridge, said: “I am pleased Network Rail has given the undertaking not to simply demolish the bridge.”
City councillor John Tanner, who was on the planning committee which refused the prior approval, said: “I am very pleased Network Rail has said this.
“It would be outrageous if they were to knock the bridge down without replacing it.
“Lets hope this is the first step towards getting a modern bridge with access for wheelchairs and prams.
“Network Rail needs the cooperation of the city council to electrify the rail line and we all want to see that happen, but it is daft to put up a new bridge which is a replica from the 1940s.”
Comments(13)
Sandy Wimpole-Smythe
says...
11:28am Sun 24 Mar 13
Myron Blatz wrote:Or it maybe political correctness gone too far. In reality how many disabled people REALLY want or need to use this bridge. Just because we can (in this case build a bridge for everyone) doesn't always mean we should.
For a body which is heavily involved in transportation mobility, Network Rail should be publicly shamed into providing EQUAL ACCESS TO ALL PEOPLE NOT JUST THE ABLE-BODIED - and would Network Rail be allowed by the Government to show such levels of blatant discrimination, if this was deemed a 'racial issue' in this supposedly 'enlightened' age in which we supposedly have fought for? The real issue isn't about adequate bridge access for the disabled and those with mobility issues at the South Hinksey-Oxford location, but about Network Rail making such such provision in the rest of Oxfordshire and the Country.
Manor Born
says...
12:29pm Sun 24 Mar 13
Manor Born
says...
12:30pm Sun 24 Mar 13
wend
says...
2:03pm Sun 24 Mar 13
King Joke
says...
4:15pm Sun 24 Mar 13
1. The Devil's Backbone has recently been resurfaced, and is now perfectly passable by wheelchair.
2. Ramps would not only enable wheelchair access but cycle access. Cycling from S Hinksey to Oxford currently entails either:
2.1 Lifting your bike up the steps which will be even higher when the bridge is raised, or:
2.2 A grim ride on a cycle path by the A34, which is bumpy as hell and strewn with broken glass from vehicle collisions.
3. THere is plent of room for ramps on both sides of the railway. NR recently built ramped bridges at Charlbury and Honeybourne because they legally had to - the ramps double back on themselves so don't take up much space. On the country side the ramps would be on the scrub land by Hinksey Sidings. On the town side they would have to be on piers in the lake, like the current footbridge is.
wend
says...
5:03pm Sun 24 Mar 13
Myron Blatz
says...
9:26pm Sun 24 Mar 13
davidrnewman
says...
12:58am Mon 25 Mar 13
Wouldn't a spiral ramp fit easily into the space?
And is the bridge part of the premises of Network Rail to which the Disability Discrimination Act applies?
King Joke
says...
8:39am Mon 25 Mar 13
I'm no civil engineer so I can't comment on the ease of building over the lake. THere is even a narrow strip of land between the up fast line and the lake you could put ramps on, you may not need to build over the lake that much.
My fear is we spend months wearing down NR and are finally victorious, only for some moaning w anchor to object to the ramps because they don't like the look of them out of their back window, or shock horror, from the bowls club.
wend
says...
2:56pm Mon 25 Mar 13
King Joke
says...
3:18pm Mon 25 Mar 13
It wouldn't surprise me if no wheelchair users ever cross the bridge - because it's impossible for them to do so! Ditto pushchair users; although I have seen them lift pushchairs up the steps, a lot of parents use those rucksack things you put children in.
There is some fair demand from cyclists.
How do you really gauge demand, though, until the facility is there?
I don't see what you're getting at regarding the railway project - the electrified railway will go ahead regardless, this campaign will hardly stop it, just add a bit of cost - probably around £1m. NR's annual budget is something like £7bn.
It will cost far less than the County Council is spending on hamburgerisation of the Hinksey Hill and Kennington roundabouts.
Wend, I will re-re-iterate, the Devil's Backbone has a decent surface now, and the bridge over the Eynsham AC lake has high-grip pads on the approach ramps.
wend
says...
4:06pm Mon 25 Mar 13
Myron Blatz says...
10:23pm Sat 23 Mar 13