Decision imminent on demolition of footbridge

The Oxford Times: A cyclist negotiates the steep steps of the Hinksey footbridge Buy this photo » A cyclist negotiates the steep steps of the Hinksey footbridge

A GOVERMENT inspector’s ruling on whether a railway footbridge in Oxford can be demolished is imminent.

Peter Rickett, a spokesman for the Planning Inspectorate, said a decision on an appeal regarding Hinksey Bridge, which links South Oxford and the path to South Hinksey village, is expected before Christmas or early in the new year.

The existing bridge, which runs from near Lake Street in South Oxford, has to be replaced as part of plans for electrifiction of the line.

But Network Rail says it cannot afford to include ramps – which would make it easier for cyclists, people with children in buggies and the disabled to negotiate the tall bridge.

South Hinksey resident Peter Rawcliffe, who has been heading a campaign for Network Rail to include ramps, said: “The Planning Inspectorate has said the decision will be any day.

“It will be a pretty big decision whichever way it goes.

“If the planning inspector allows the appeal then it could have big implications for bridges up and down the country, but we think Hinksey Bridge is a special case because it connects two communities.”

Plans for the replacement bridge were thrown out by the city council because it did not include ramps.

Related links

Network Rail says it has only been given the funding for a like-for-like replacement of the bridge and that disabled ramps could, in theory, be added at a later date.

Under the Oxford and Rugby Railways Act 1845, Network Rail does not have to seek planning permission to replace Hinksey Bridge, but merely needs “prior approval” which is decided on narrower grounds than a normal planning application. Grounds include that the design of the bridge would “injure the amenity of the neighbourhood” and could be modified to avoid such injury.

The company has now submitted a similar application for the railway footbridge off Whitehouse Road which runs to college sports pitches and Hogacre Common, also without ramps.

Network Rail spokesman Russell Spink said he did not have any information about when the appeal result would be announced.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:25am Fri 20 Dec 13

Dilligaf2010 says...

Surely somebody, somewhere, has considered a tunnel under the tracks?
Simple to do, remove tracks, dig large pit, insert pre-cast concrete sections, infill, re-lay tracks......everybod
y happy.
Surely somebody, somewhere, has considered a tunnel under the tracks? Simple to do, remove tracks, dig large pit, insert pre-cast concrete sections, infill, re-lay tracks......everybod y happy. Dilligaf2010

10:30am Fri 20 Dec 13

Andrew:Oxford says...

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
Surely somebody, somewhere, has considered a tunnel under the tracks?
Simple to do, remove tracks, dig large pit, insert pre-cast concrete sections, infill, re-lay tracks......everybod

y happy.
Definitely not.

The local "Activists" would never permit it as it may affect the water table. (Besides It's *very wet* around there as it is).
[quote][p][bold]Dilligaf2010[/bold] wrote: Surely somebody, somewhere, has considered a tunnel under the tracks? Simple to do, remove tracks, dig large pit, insert pre-cast concrete sections, infill, re-lay tracks......everybod y happy.[/p][/quote]Definitely not. The local "Activists" would never permit it as it may affect the water table. (Besides It's *very wet* around there as it is). Andrew:Oxford

11:03am Fri 20 Dec 13

Geoff Roberts says...

Simple. Just get some gardening equipment and dig under the track. Easy! Like back in the old days when good old Bazalgette was around. Plus it's really cheap to do and safe. When it really rains there'll be the added advantage of having somewhere for the water in that thing they call a 'lake', to go. Of course the celeriac eating, yoghurt knitting, soap dodging residents of places like Lake Street and Marlborough Road will be out in badger suits chaining themselves to diggers and stuff.
Simple. Just get some gardening equipment and dig under the track. Easy! Like back in the old days when good old Bazalgette was around. Plus it's really cheap to do and safe. When it really rains there'll be the added advantage of having somewhere for the water in that thing they call a 'lake', to go. Of course the celeriac eating, yoghurt knitting, soap dodging residents of places like Lake Street and Marlborough Road will be out in badger suits chaining themselves to diggers and stuff. Geoff Roberts

12:12pm Fri 20 Dec 13

King Joke says...

It's precisely because there is a lake about 2m below track level that you couldn't build a tunnel here. I suspect it would cost NR even more to build a tunnel than a DDA-compliant bridge here anyway.
It's precisely because there is a lake about 2m below track level that you couldn't build a tunnel here. I suspect it would cost NR even more to build a tunnel than a DDA-compliant bridge here anyway. King Joke

10:51pm Fri 20 Dec 13

Milkbutnosugarplease says...

I don't want to go to Hinksey, oh no, it does not move me...
I don't want to go to Hinksey, oh no, it does not move me... Milkbutnosugarplease

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree