Police given fresh powers to tackle street gatherings

The Oxford Times: The notice The notice

POLICE now have the power to break up gatherings of two or more people in a bid to beat anti-social behaviour in the centre of Oxford.

A dispersal order has this month been introduced in the Speedwell Street area and anyone who refuses to move-on could face a fine up to £2,500 or three months in prison.

Inspector Andy Thompson said the move was designed to stop large groups gathering near homeless shelters and causing problems.

He said: “If there is someone who has no legitimate reason to be down that street, and there is a likelihood they could contribute to antisocial behaviour, we have power to direct them to leave.”

Police received 54 complaints of anti-social behaviour in the area between January and November last year, according to the Home Office’s crime mapping website police.uk. In 2012 there were 51 complaints following the 107 in 2011.

It is the second time police and Oxford City Council have used the Anti-social Behaviour Act to break-up groups. In 2006, a dispersal order was agreed to tackle intimidating behaviour from groups of youths in The Oval, Rose Hill and at Iffley Lock.

The latest move was authorised by Oxford area commander Superintendent Christian Bunt who said: “Anti-social behaviour which blights the lives of Oxford City residents will simply not be tolerated.”

Related links

Lesley Dewhurst, chief executive of Oxford Homeless Pathways, which runs the O’Hanlon House hostel in Luther Street, welcomed the order.

She said: “We want to discourage people who aren’t using our services to stop hanging around and the dispersal order will do that.”

Butterwyke Place resident June Bear, a 72-year-old retired Oxford Magistrates’ Court usher, said: “I don’t know where it came from. (The police) have to be seen doing something if people are complaining but I personally haven’t had any problems.”

One man outside the hostel said those who gathered there were annoyed about the order.

He said: “It just bothers everyone. They are always moving us on.

Dispersal order explained

  • THE dispersal order came in to force on January 1 and will stay in place until June 30.

It covers Speedwell Street, Luther Street, Butterwyck Place, and Cromwell Road.

Under the order a police officer or PCSO can order a group of two or more people to disperse, order anyone who does not live in the area to leave, or tell anyone who does not live in the area to leave and not return for up to 24 hours.

A person under 16 in the area between 9pm and 6am can be returned to their home address. Failure to comply means a fine of up to £2,500 or three months’ jail.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:12pm Wed 22 Jan 14

King Joke says...

This is very disturbing for anybody wanting to express views some people do not wish to hear.

There are existing laws to tackle anti-social behaviour, why not just use those?
This is very disturbing for anybody wanting to express views some people do not wish to hear. There are existing laws to tackle anti-social behaviour, why not just use those? King Joke

8:22pm Wed 22 Jan 14

Kropotkin says...

"A person under 16 in the area between 9pm and 6am can be returned to their home address"

The press often reports this but it is not true. An NGO took the government to court on this issue in 2005 and won. Lord Justice Brooke said:

"After all, all of us have the right to walk the streets without interference from police constables or CSOs unless they possess common law or statutory powers to stop us. There is no relevant common law power, and section 30(6) of the 2003 Act does not create an express power to use force"
"A person under 16 in the area between 9pm and 6am can be returned to their home address" The press often reports this but it is not true. An NGO took the government to court on this issue in 2005 and won. Lord Justice Brooke said: "After all, all of us have the right to walk the streets without interference from police constables or CSOs unless they possess common law or statutory powers to stop us. There is no relevant common law power, and section 30(6) of the 2003 Act does not create an express power to use force" Kropotkin

3:51pm Thu 23 Jan 14

jockox3 says...

Of course nobody wants to have to see how unable the homeless faciiites are to cope with demand. Best sweep them under any carpet but there.
Of course nobody wants to have to see how unable the homeless faciiites are to cope with demand. Best sweep them under any carpet but there. jockox3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree