Decorator avoids jail for bid to con elderly customer

The Oxford Times: Decorator avoids jail for bid to con elderly customer Decorator avoids jail for bid to con elderly customer

A DECORATOR who tried to con a 78-year-old man out of £2,500 has been handed a suspended prison sentence.

Dean Welch tried to charge the disabled pensioner for work at his Headington home in June 2012.

The victim had originally been approached by another man who said he could paint the outside of his house for £5,000 before cutting the fee to £2,500.

Welch, of Redbridge Hollow, Oxford, then worked on decorating the house but later said he had taken over the job and supplied an invoice to the victim.

But Oxfordshire County Council trading standards said a surveyor had found paint had been splashed and spilled and it was already peeling off the elderly man’s walls.

Welch, 41, admitted two counts of engaging in a commercial practice which was misleading, and one count of knowingly or recklessly engaging in commercial practice which contravenes professional diligence, at Oxford Magistrates’ Court in November.

At Oxford Crown Court Judge Tom Corrie gave him a seven-month prison sentence suspended for two years.

He was also handed a 12-month supervision order.

Richard Webb, head of trading standards, said: “This case is an example of a trader preying on a vulnerable person, who then became intimidated with the tactics that were used. This should serve as a warning to anyone engaged in this kind of activity.

“People should never hand over money before a job is completed to the standard that they expect.”

Related links

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:23pm Wed 26 Feb 14

H.J.Harris says...

This should serve as a warning ? what sort of warning is that ?
This sentence is farcical. He doesn't even appear to have been made to clear up the ness - or preferably pay someone else to do a proper job.
No doubt having a good laugh at the victim and the Judge,.
This should serve as a warning ? what sort of warning is that ? This sentence is farcical. He doesn't even appear to have been made to clear up the ness - or preferably pay someone else to do a proper job. No doubt having a good laugh at the victim and the Judge,. H.J.Harris
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree