News RSS Feed


Cyclists urged to see the light

8:41pm Sunday 16th November 2008

comment Comments (10)   Have your say »


Police in North Oxford have stopped 201 cyclists for not having lights, or riding on pavements, since July in a crackdown on dangerous riding.

On Friday night, officers set up an operation on Banbury and Woodstock roads and issued 28 cyclists with £30 fines.

Their get-tough approach comes after cyclists failed to heed earlier softer warnings from police.

Those caught without lights have been offered the chance to avoid the fine by buying a set of lights and producing the receipt to police within a week.

The purge follows a sting in Oxford High Street last month where a cyclist was caught riding without lights almost every two minutes.

During that operation — the first this winter — police dished out 83 fines to cyclists in an hour-and-a-half.

Excuses for cycling in the dark included having had lights stolen, leaving them at home and claiming there were enough street lights for cyclists to be seen by other road users.

Sgt Emma Garside said: “Issues involving cycling are the number one priority for the Summertown neighbourhood — and that covers everything from cycling on the pavement to cycling without lights, going through red traffic lights and the inconsiderate use of bicycles.

“In this area there are a lot of cyclists and the problems have been bad for a long time.

“We have been issuing verbal warnings and still people aren’t taking notice, so it was felt stronger enforcement was needed.”

Officers also stopped people whose batteries had run out, and several who had recently had their bike lights stolen. Most of them were warned and told to walk, rather than ride.

André Mazur, 16, from Old Marston, was stopped on Banbury Road after cycling on the pavement.

He said: “I will be more careful in future.”

Sgt Garside said operations would continue.


Your Say YourThe Oxford Times

markmac, Oxford says...
11:52pm Sun 16 Nov 08

If they're going to get tough on 'cycling on the pavement' perhaps they'd care to put in a proper cycle lane down the Woodstock road - instead of ending it half-way down on the WRONG side of the road and expecting cyclists to swerve across three lanes! It might also help if there were a few more shared crossings - getting across the Woodstock road is a nightmare with children. And don't get me started on sharing bus lanes. Its scary how few car drivers bother to look left before turning.

Quentin Walker, Oxford says...
8:12am Mon 17 Nov 08

"Those caught without lights have been offered the chance to avoid the fine by buying a set of lights and producing the receipt to police within a week."

Either a fine has been issued or it hasn't. These people are taking the Mick and the fines should stand. Lights on a bicycle during the hours of darkness are mandatory, not optional.

The police should consider the feelings of the poor driver who will, one night, knock down and injure or worse, kill one of these selfish cyclists.

Joe Chapman, Oxford says...
8:48am Mon 17 Nov 08

About time too. I know take a longer route to and from work in order to avoid confrontations with cyclists riding on the pavement who expect pedestrians to get out of their way. I've been insulted and threatened with being stabbed simply for standing up for myself. At very least it is rude, at worst it can be dangerous especially as some people don't even bother to avoid bus queues.Some people think all of this is a bit petty and there are more imporatnt things to worry about, I think if we sort out these 'petty' things people would be more considerate and society a lot better for it.

Captain Pugwash, Oxford says...
9:18am Mon 17 Nov 08

Quentin you are missing the point. Lights on bikes are already mandatory, people are just ignoring the fact. It is a far more sensible policy to encourage people to purchase lights and not just issuing a fine for not having them. After all, the driver is still going to knock down the cyclist who doesn't have lights regardless of whether he's been fined for the offence before.
And Joe, yes totally agree that cyclists should keep off the pavements. However pedestrians should also stop walking in cycle lanes where they run parallel with the pavement.
If motorists, cyclists and pedestrians all act in a responsible way, we'll all rub along nicely.

markmac, Oxford says...
10:38am Mon 17 Nov 08

Pugwash - well said: the problem isn't any specific /class/ of people be it cyclists pedestrians or car drivers, its the idiots who think the law doesn't apply to them - be it pedestrians who walk into cycle lanes while jabbering on their phone or step off the pavement in the rain without looking properly, cyclists who go backwards up one-way streets after dark without lights, or car drivers who veer into cycle lanes and zones at litghs, and turn left without looking.

everythingburnseventaully, oxford says...
10:39am Mon 17 Nov 08

1. Make cyclists sit a test and have to get a license
2. Make them pay a (very small) amount of road tax and have to get subsidised insurance
3. Thes payments get them fixed lights on every new bike as well as free hi-vi kit and helmets and also go to pay for cycle track improvements
4. Promote responsibilty instead of pandering to a minority's needs. Educate and train. we all have things we do wrong on the roads
5. Arrest and fine the idiots that cycle on the pavement who are beyond help

Quentin Walker, Oxford says...
11:36am Mon 17 Nov 08

Quentin Walker, Oxford says...
8:12am Mon 17 Nov 08

Lights on a bicycle during the hours of darkness are mandatory, not optional.

Captain Pugwash, Oxford says...
9:18am Mon 17 Nov 08
Quentin you are missing the point. Lights on bikes are already mandatory,

Pugwash, how did you become a captain?

Massy, Oxford says...
11:45am Mon 17 Nov 08

Quentin talks about "the poor driver who will, one night, knock down and injure or worse, kill one of these selfish cyclists". Would that be the poor driver who has forgotten to switch his car lights on?
I see several of these each week including buses. And not they don't get fined either, it seems.

icba1957, Abingdon says...
1:07pm Tue 18 Nov 08

Massy,
The whole point of this discussion is that even without lights a cyclist or a driver can still see, but they can't BE SEEN.
Anyone in charge of any kind of vehicle during the hours of darkness should be fined if they don't use lights. End of, no excuses.

Rachel Browne, Banbury says...
4:11pm Sat 29 Nov 08

Times have truly changed.

Police stopped me on my bike for cycling without lights on the Woodstock Road back in the 70s. They showed concern. They told me to lock up my bike and drove me home.

These were times when we weren't all persecuting and blaming one another.

Comments are closed on this article.

SAFETY FIRST: PCSO Sam Higginson and PC Amanda Kerman stop cyclists without lights             Picture: Antony Moore SAFETY FIRST: PCSO Sam Higginson and PC Amanda Kerman stop cyclists without lights Picture: Antony Moore

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »