News RSS Feed


Planners back Fewcott wind farm application

Fewcott villagers protest against the planned wind farm Fewcott villagers protest against the planned wind farm

VILLAGERS are furious wind turbines twice the height of Nelson’s Column are likely to be built near their homes.

Planning officers at Cherwell District Council have recommended the £10m wind farm on farmland between Fewcott and Fritwell, near Bicester, is approved on Thursday.

If successful, it will see four 125-metre-high turbines in two fields at Willowbank Farm, just south of the M40.

So far the council has received 113 letters of objection and 249 letters supporting the proposal from across the country and the USA.

Local people say they support renewable energy schemes, but believe Fewcott is the wrong site for wind turbines and they would be better suited in open moorland or at sea.

Ian Corkin, of Ardley with Fewcott Parish Council, said: “It’s a problem because Cherwell’s planning committee may feel they should be supportive, but it has got to be in the right setting.

“You can’t put 400ft turbines a few hundred metres from ordinary size dwellings. It will absolutely dominate the entire area.”

Each turbine will stand 15 times higher than the average house and the nearest home — excluding the farmer’s house — will be about 500 metres from a turbine.

Mr Corkin said there had been no testing at the site and the Government’s own statistics showed the average wind speed of the area is 15mph — wind turbines only start turning at 9mph.

He said: “In this context, wind turbines of this size are only ever put out at sea. They are absolutely enormous. It very much comes down to the fact it is an inappropriate development for the area.”

Villagers are also concerned about noise, traffic issues during construction and transporting the turbines through the narrow roads to get to the villages.

Residents are also concerned about the effect from the turbines when the sun hits a moving blade and causes flickering shadows.

Sheila Ultsch, chairman of Fritwell Parish Council, said residents said the turbines would be too close to homes.

She said: “They are also worried about when these things are being built they will be brought in enormous trucks. We don’t know how they are going to negotiate the roads to get to the site.

“Whilst we have every sympathy with green issues, I think this is the wrong site.”

Residents’ complaints come just a month after Climate Change Secretary Ed Milliband said opposition to wind farms should become as socially unacceptable as failing to wear a seatbelt.

Bolsterstone, the firm due to operate the wind farm, was unavailable for comment.

There is a wind farm at Watchfield, near Faringdon. Tesco plans to install a turbine at its Banbury store and the Co-op has been planning one off Botley Road, Oxford.

Comments(6)

js3 says...
11:09am Fri 17 Apr 09

I think these people opposing this should stop being selfish instead be proud of living in an are that produces clean, beautiful energy. The turbines are beautiful, quiet and soothing to watch. Compare them to a coal power plant, for example.
I'd love to live near a wind farm.
Put aside your petty selfishness and think of the cleanliness instead.

OxfordDude82 says...
5:30pm Fri 17 Apr 09

I totally agree with you js3. The local protesters are clearly motivated only by their own material greed instead of caring about the wider community, the nation and the world.

Also, notice the shameless manipulation of children in the protest! (see the article photograph)

The adults responsible for this should be absolutely ashamed of themselves.

I've lived in Bicester all of my life and I am proud the council are deciding to support this wise and forward-thinking development.

focus1 says...
6:57pm Fri 17 Apr 09

living in Fritwell I do not have a problem with wind power In fact I wanted to put solar panels on My listed building house but was told by Cherwell council it was not in keeping with the area. 125 metre tall wind turbines that I will see from my house are in keeping. Why do they ave to be situated so close a residential aera. as for being selfish I have been told by two property experts that the windmills will affect the value of my house by almost £100,000 so if all those people in Bicester would like to send me a cheque for £1000 each I will only need 100 residents to pay up and it should not cost me anything apart from the view, noise, increased traffic, flickers in sunlight. still maybe I will get some free electricity to compensate.

Regards

Focus1

OxfordDude82 says...
11:36pm Fri 17 Apr 09

Trying to refute selfishness by publishing your potential financial losses is pretty self-defeating don't ya think?

Besides, the sizeable investment in the two villages and their communities on behalf of the company behind the turbines would significantly effect that estimate. The villages could be greatly enhanced with that money- not to mention the boost in the local economy that comes with such projects.

The proposed sight is in perfect accordance with national guidelines with regards to distance to dwellings.

As for light flickers- have you considered how >astronomically< slim the chance of that ever actually effecting anyone is?


Abingdon Neil says...
2:24pm Sun 19 Apr 09

Where do the people who live in this area think their electricity comes from now?

It is from large power stations like the ones at Didcot whose residents have to live in its shadow.

Far better to have lots of small renewable energy generation than huge carbon belching power stations.

Nick Mawer says...
2:59pm Tue 21 Apr 09

I don’t live within the shadow of these turbines, so I can not be accused of nimbyism. Those people who are blindly in favour of wind power show a remarkable lack of understanding of economics and meteorology. I have paraphrased Christopher Booker below.
The unavoidable fact is that wind speeds around the British Isles are constantly varying, often providing no power at all - so that the electricity actually generated by these turbines represents only between a quarter and a third of their nominal 'capacity'. This means that conventional coal (like Didcot), gas, oil or nuclear-fired power stations must be on permanent stand-by to provide all the electricity the turbines are not able to produce when the wind is not blowing.
Paul Golby, the chief executive of E.ON came up with the shattering admission that the back-up needed for new wind turbines would amount to 90 per cent of their capacity. This alone would mean building scores more gas and coal-fired power plants, to guarantee continuous supply during those times when the wind is not blowing.
For the sum of £100 billion which the Government plans to spend on the new turbines, we could buy 37 'carbon-free' nuclear power stations at current prices, permanently supplying enough electricity to cover all our current needs.


click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree