News RSS Feed Send your news


Fresh fight over 'Gateway' plans


A crucial hearing begins on Thursday to decide whether a controversial new business park can be built in North Oxford.

Oxford City Council’s plans for the Northern Gateway business park on 100 acres of land near the Pear Tree roundabout, have sparked outrage among the community in Wolvercote.

But the scheme could provide 5,000 new jobs for the city – and the council insists it is important for the area’s economy.

More than 200 people packed out a public meeting at Wolvercote Village Hall two weeks ago for their first opportunity to quiz council officials on the plans.

Dozens of residents and greenbelt campaigners are set to turn up at the Town Hall tomorrow to have their first official say on the plans in front of government planning inspector David Fenton.

They are calling for more protestors to turn up to show their opposition to the scheme.

Robert De Newtown, of opposition group ENGAGE, said: “The council has made the point that there is a need for employment land in the city, but we rebut that very strongly.

“In the phone book there are more than 150 companies who use the name Oxford located outside the city – some as far afield as Chipping Norton.

“It is important for this land to stay green and to maintain it for the beautiful and historic setting of Oxford.

Mr De Newtown, of Woodstock Road, said that by checking with the Land Registry, he had found 650 empty commercial properties available within a 10-mile radius of Oxford, proving there was not enough demand for more commercial land.

Two weeks ago Oxford West and Abingdon MP Dr Evan Harris warned the plans could destroy the nature of Oxford just to create space for companies trying to chase the name of the city.

Oxfordshire County Council has objected to the plans on traffic grounds, stating that the adjacent A34 is already operating at between 100 and 110 per cent capacity.

Local residents fear the development could add an extra 10,000 cars to an already congested area.

Rose Stevens, 38, from Upper Wolvercote said: “We would like as many people as possible to come to the hearing to demonstrate to the inspector the level of opposition to the development.”

Michael Crofton-Briggs, head of city development, said: “Detailed analysis by the council shows that, for the next 20 years, this land is required to support the economy of the city itself.

“In particular there is a pressing need for premises for science and research companies in close proximity to the two universities and hospitals in the city.

“The council fully supports the exciting proposals being brought forward at Harwell and Milton Business Parks.

“These will help the wider central Oxfordshire economy but, on their own, are not sufficient to meet the requirements of the Oxford city economy.

“A lot of technical work has already been carried out to assess the movement implications of the proposals at the Northern Gateway.

“The Highways Agency, in particular, is satisfied with what has been prepared to date and is no longer objecting to the principle of the development.”

Oxfordshire County Council spokesman Paul Smith said: “We have concerns regarding the likely traffic implications of employment-led development in the Northern Gateway and remain to be convinced that adequate measures would be put in place to minimise car trips to the site, or mitigate the effects of additional traffic in this very congested location.”

The meeting starts at 9.30am tomorrow. Members of the public can still email their views on the council’s core strategy, to progofficer@aol.com.

Comments must be received by the end of the hearing on Friday.


Your Say YourOxford

Any One, OX1 says...
8:17pm Tue 8 Sep 09

Oh Dear Here we go again the priviledged few demanding the right to veto anyone else wishing to benefit from land. Perhaps when these homeowners but their houses they should buy all the land around just to make sure they can insist on who lives works near them. No doubt the same people will be campaigning for jobs and homes near to them when it is their children that have grown and are in need of the above. The site makes perfect sense in relation to road networks. We all have to accept that unless the population suddenly starts decreasing ( no...I am not talking about immigrants) more and more facilities are needed. That means people need to start addressing how many children they have...

Alfie Nokes, Oxford says...
11:31pm Tue 8 Sep 09

Any One - The site makes no sense if you include the proposed emergency service stations being placed there. How is having the ambulance station at nearly oppiste side of the city to the hospital sensible? The site is better for the fire engines than at Rewley Road how exactly? The green land in the area is college and common land, why on earth should locals need to buy what they have historically had right to? Again a change of projected figures of employment with each new update.

Massy, Oxford says...
11:58pm Tue 8 Sep 09

I suppose if the County actually had a sustainable traffic policy then this site could be developed with far less impact than an additional 10 000 cars would bring. If we didn't tarmac over large parts of the city for car parking, existing developed might just suffice.

pft1944, Oxford says...
9:41am Wed 9 Sep 09

Buildings don't create jobs, they only provide space. There are already 3 jobs for every worker in Oxford and empty buildings all over the place, including the Cowley Business Park, which has been under construction for 17 years, and has 50% of its buildings unoccupied! What Oxford needs is affordable housing, not empty offices. This proposal simply lines the pockets of the Chinese-backed Australian developers; what benefit is that for our city?

Webwatcher, Long Hanborough says...
12:00pm Wed 9 Sep 09

Oxford has had a problem for many years in that there are far more jobs than homes for the people taking these jobs. Creating even more jobs would mean that the people taking them would have to find homes in the ooter reaches of the county such as Bicester, Carterton or Witney and then commute on the already very crowded A40 and A34 roads into Oxford. With no significant improvements for the A40 planned, the result would be be that the queues already stretching 10 miles back to Witney for a couple of hours in the morning would stretch back towards Burford as public transport is still only a bus service and the buses would be held up in the queues with all the cars as they are at present.
This proposal is planning gone mad!

Abingdon Neil, Abingdon says...
3:03pm Wed 9 Sep 09

The problem in Oxford is too many jobs and too few houses. There are loads of empty business premises - take a walk round the Osney Mead Industrial Estate and, as others have said, the undeveloped business park in Cowley.

The City Council should be supporting the use of the sites that are already available and turning some of them back over to housing.

Also - having green space between settlements, in this case between Oxford and Kidlington, benefits everyone.

Whopper w/Cheese, B.K. says...
5:36pm Wed 9 Sep 09

This business park is badly needed, for many reasons, firstly North Oxford is devoid of any decent development, and then all of the jobs that it will bring, along with joining up Kiddy with Oxford City itself, great road links M40, A40, A34. I just wish that the Saddo NIMBYS would keep their noses out. I did not see them up in arms when Cowley business Pk or Sandford Science Pk was built. I for one with an OX2 6** postcode have expressed my absoloute support for this, both by email and writing. I hope that progress will not be held back by the selfish people of North Oxford who look no further than their own wallets, and care for nobody else

Any One, OX1 says...
6:07pm Wed 9 Sep 09

Dear Alfie...Get a grip

They are not planning to build on Port Meadow or the Common.

And, as for the fire engines...how exactly is being stuck in Oxford City Centre useful or practical. The roads at the new proposed base make far more sense for getting to the hospital quicker...its called the ring road...thats what it was designed for.

Incidentally there are very few 'true wolvercote commoners left'... try checking out how many people pass on there 'rights' in an underhand manner to relatives and those that no longer live in the village.
Wolvercote hardly welcomes anyone; it does its best to object to any proposal that might enable others to benefit from living in such a pleasant area. Wolvercote promotes itself as a low carbon village and 'anti car' yet go count how many cars sit in each driveway, and watch how many residents drive theri children to the oh so local school.


Any One, OX1 says...
6:07pm Wed 9 Sep 09

Dear Alfie...Get a grip

They are not planning to build on Port Meadow or the Common.

And, as for the fire engines...how exactly is being stuck in Oxford City Centre useful or practical. The roads at the new proposed base make far more sense for getting to the hospital quicker...its called the ring road...thats what it was designed for.

Incidentally there are very few 'true wolvercote commoners left'... try checking out how many people pass on there 'rights' in an underhand manner to relatives and those that no longer live in the village.
Wolvercote hardly welcomes anyone; it does its best to object to any proposal that might enable others to benefit from living in such a pleasant area. Wolvercote promotes itself as a low carbon village and 'anti car' yet go count how many cars sit in each driveway, and watch how many residents drive their children to the oh so local school.


Foxy Lady, Oxford says...
7:42am Thu 10 Sep 09

Its not about being NIMBYS - thats just a ridiculous statement from Cheesburger - common sense is what is missing from how we plan anything - we will only ever learn when its all too late - you cannot give back land once you have built and buried it - its gone for good and no matter where I live, in fact from being homeless at 15 - I am grateful to live anywhere - so stop saying that its about basic snobbery really - thats what your implying. Its common sense and people everywhere trying to get a voice heard over these money money money grabbers which destroy lives.


Whopper w/Cheese, B.K. says...
12:45pm Thu 10 Sep 09

Foxy lady. It IS my N OX. Neighbours who are MONEY MONEY MONEY GRABBERS, as you put it. If it was an Opera house due to go on the site, no problem, as that would not bring down their already over-inflated house prices.

sparky123456, Oxford says...
2:58pm Thu 10 Sep 09

this is a tricky one, Oxford should develop its land to attract big business to move out of the city for reduced rents. Many big corporations have done this. Oxford seems to focus too much on developing sites to suit businesses which will compliment the University or NHS but not look to coax successful private sector companies to Oxford from other areas. Although no area's should be developed for business until the dire housing situation in oxford has been sorted out and transport links are upgraded. In theory though Oxford should be an economic powerhouse for private and public sector. It has a direct links to London & Birmingham, is 45-60mins by road to 2 major international cities and thei airports, has world renowned educational and healthcare establishments and a local airport nearby. I sometimes think the University pays the council off to benefit itself!

dowhat, Oxford says...
10:20am Fri 11 Sep 09

Only sometimes?

dowhat, Oxford says...
10:24am Fri 11 Sep 09

An opera house would be more of an enhancement to Wolvercote than a business park, but if it generated vast traffic queues it would quickly become unpopular, and a blight on the village. Residents should, and do, have the right to object to what they can see is a bad plan.

dowhat, Oxford says...
10:43am Fri 11 Sep 09

The business park aims to move jobs out of Central Oxford as much as create them. Newly vacant premises would then get used for what - another business; housing; student digs; or left vacant?

Newly created jobs would be accessible only by car, unless Wolvercote Halt is re-opened. Only buses from Central Oxford will not get caught in the traffic jams; the roundabout will become a nightmare; emergency services will get caught in it too.

Commoners are sometimes crafty with their rights because their inheritors cannot afford to live in Wolvercote. There are not enough houses. Surrounding areas are filling up as well. Village youth used to move to Kidlington, now it is Bicester.

More allotments would serve the village better. And some APPROPRIATE, affordable housing.

And by the way, a few years years ago the "oh so local school" survived a plan to demolish it for housing, when there was a fast buck to be made that way. Now the refurbished school is thriving, to the heartfelt relief of at least 3 generations of former pupils who still live in the area.

dowhat, Oxford says...
10:46am Fri 11 Sep 09

Fill up the business parks that already exist before you claim that more are needed. It it must be near North Oxford there's one in Eynsham.

Alfie Nokes, Oxford says...
5:08pm Fri 11 Sep 09

Any One - Maybe they are not planning to build on Port Meadow or the Common, they are planning to build on green land when there is no need.

Considering where the bulk of old buildings that make Oxford what it is are in the centre "being stuck in Oxford City Centre" appears to be useful and practical. Rewley Road, which I mentioned is on the ring road, so your point about the new one eing on the ring road makes no sense. The right place for ambulance service vehicles is with the hospital, that is common sense.

Your comment about the "very few 'true wolvercote commoners left" is addressed by another poster.

Whopper w/Cheese, B.K. says...
2:07pm Tue 15 Sep 09

Lady up your own ar(e you didn't complain when B.M.W. opened up at Wlovecote Roundabout. So is your problem that you don't want poor people opening up a business. Only rich brands for you eh ?

Comments are closed on this article.

Dr Evan Harris MP, centre, joins families protesting against the Northern Gateway plans Dr Evan Harris MP, centre, joins families protesting against the Northern Gateway plans

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »