News RSS Feed Send your news


Sixteen children turned down for places at Wolvercote school


SIXTEEN families in Wolvercote have been told there is no room for their children at the local primary school.

The reception class at the primary school in First Turn has been filled with 30 pupils, leaving other villagers facing a drive to other schools, including North Kidlington Primary about four miles away.

Mum-of-two Alex Barratt, 35, of Lower Wolvercote, has been told there is no place for her daughter, Edith, four next month, in September.

She said: “This is devastating. Living in the village, with Edith in the pre-school, we thought she would get a place.

“We moved to Wolvercote about five years ago because it is a village with a strong community bond and a village school serving the children who live here.

“Wolvercote is making an effort to be a low-carbon village and I don’t want to have to drive my daughter four miles to Kidlington.”

Mrs Barratt said parents would try to appeal both as a group, and as individuals.

Headteacher Anna Ballance said: “Sixteen families in the Wolvercote area have been affected and I have great sympathy for them.

“The school is not enormous – there are 220 pupils here, including the nursery, and there are 30 places per year group.

“Ten of the families are from the village, while the others are from other parts of the catchment area.

“Some of the children affected are already at our nursery and this is a big shock for parents who expect their children to get into the village school.”

Jean Fooks, Liberal Democrat county councillor for Summertown and Wolvercote, said a baby boom had put pressure on primary school admissions in the area.

She said 44 pupils were refused a place for the reception year at Wolvercote Primary.

Of those, 25 chose the school as their first preference, including the 16 from the school catchment area.

About 100 people attended a meeting of the Wolvercote Commoners Committee on Wednesday night where appeal plans were discussed.

Committee secretary Andrew Burchardt said: “We don’t want Wolvercote to become a ghost village as far as children are concerned because families feel they have to leave.”

Michael Waine, Oxfordshire County Council cabinet member for schools improvement, said the affected parents would be written to.

He continued: “We’ve created an extra 338 primary places to enable us to offer a place [in September] to every on-time applicant from Oxfordshire.

“More than 95 per cent of applicants have received one of their top three choices at primary.”


Your Say YourOxford

JanetJ, oxford says...
8:17pm Thu 4 Mar 10

What happens if the families refused a place don't have a car to take their children to Kidlington?

waylander_2, oxford says...
3:29am Fri 5 Mar 10

Why are children from parts other than Wolvercote being offered places at WOLVERCOTE school? Children from the North Oxford area should be going to Cutteslowe School and leaving the places for the Wolvercote children.

Green123, Witney says...
8:22am Fri 5 Mar 10

When I was a small child, I was sent to the primary school that was nearest to my home. All of the other children at my school lived nearby - and the only child who came to school by car was a girl with a physical disability that prevented her from walking very far. When we were 11, we all went up to 'big school', again the one nearest our home. There was none of this driving across town to other schools, no faffing with buses and no wringing of hands about how good or bad the school was - it was a local school with a mix of local people, and I'm pretty sure we all turned out OK! All children should go to the school that is nearest their home, geographically - there should be no further selection criteria applied.

bigsis17bicester, bicester says...
12:33pm Fri 5 Mar 10

I personally think this is just down to snobbery!!. In the village where I live, parents will bring their children from the town not wanting them to go to the schools there, of which their are about six. Not only is the school out of town, it is out of catchment, so when it comes to the children leaving primary, they would have fight to get them into the out of catchment secondary or Grammar.

Bookman, Oxford says...
2:43pm Fri 5 Mar 10

So Michael Waine is proud of the fact that 95% of applicants have received one of their first THREE choices at primary. What a weasel use of statistics. Another way of looking at it is that 5% of applicants have received their FOURTH or worse choice. Yet he regards this as a success. No wonder the system is in such a mess.

The situation in Wolvercote is an absolute disgrace. It appears that a stricter residency test might have been applied. Clearly when the school was expanded to 5-11 years old the forward planning was inadequate. In a previous generation the council would have had a conscience about this and brought in temporary classrooms until they sorted out the mess. Instead they send Wolvercote children to schools in areas with no direct transport connections to the village. This is additionally thoughtless. I wish the aggrieved Wolvercote parents good luck with their justified protests.

Thinkingoutloud, Oxford says...
6:38pm Fri 5 Mar 10

I don't know too much about this but I do recall that when applying for a school place you are asked to put down several preferences. I would be surprised if these parents chose their nearest schools and didn't get into any of them. Does this mean they picked Wolvercote as their first choice and then some other schools that they would not have any chance of getting into as they would already be full? I think the nearest school to Wolvercote is in Cutteslowe - did any of them put this school in their list of choices ? It is a lot closer than Kidlington! _ I somehow expect they picked some more affluent areas for little Toby and Felicity and have therefore been stuffed!!

Any One, OX1 says...
6:41pm Fri 5 Mar 10

hhmmmm

is this something that should be thought about when deciding to bring another child into the world?

or should all parents be given whatever free school place they want?

rugrat, Oxford says...
3:38am Sat 6 Mar 10

I suspect that Toby and Felicity wouldn't be seen dead at either Wolvercote, Cuttleslowe or any other state school. Even during these hard times "one" can rely on the grandparents to stump up the fees so that the little darlings don't have to slum it with the riff raff.

What a pity that a decent journalist wasn't on this story. The problem has been brewing for years. No-one listened when people pointed that lots of new houses were going to be built in north Oxford, but there were no additional school places. No-one listened when local people said that the Bishop Kirk site shouldn't be sold because an extra primary school would be needed in north Oxford. No-one listened when the Wolvercote governors said that the catchment area shouldn't be decided by a circle drawn on a map, but some intelligence should be used and pupils from Lower Wolvercote should have priority. No-one is listening now about the impact of developing the paper mill site or about the proposed northern gateway.

All the County Council cares about is being able to use smoke and mirrors more cleverly than the opposition to "prove" that it is providing value for money so that its members get re-elected to the gravy train.

How sad, and how devastating for the families involved.

Thinkingoutloud, Oxford says...
9:42am Sat 6 Mar 10

I don't think its the County Council's fault. I expect there are plenty of places but the nonsense of 'parental choice' means that parents are moving their little darlings all over the city to get a place of 'their choice'. Obvious outcome is that some parents will not get the school of their choice if the popular ones fill up first! I would still be interested to hear if any of these upset parents chose Cutteslowe as one of their preferences. I've heard its a very good school just not in the right social area for some parents!

JanetJ, oxford says...
11:32am Sat 6 Mar 10

Thinkingoutloud wrote:
I don't think its the County Council's fault. I expect there are plenty of places but the nonsense of 'parental choice' means that parents are moving their little darlings all over the city to get a place of 'their choice'. Obvious outcome is that some parents will not get the school of their choice if the popular ones fill up first! I would still be interested to hear if any of these upset parents chose Cutteslowe as one of their preferences. I've heard its a very good school just not in the right social area for some parents!
Still quite a hike though from Lower Wolvercote to Cutteslowe for a 5 year old. Would the County have to provide transport for the children without a place at their local school?

fourmi, Oxford says...
7:29pm Sun 7 Mar 10

Thinkingoutloud, all most people want is a place at their local school.

If people were applying for schools outside their catchment area then fair enough, but why should you have to work out what is the least popular "local" school so that you stand a chance of getting a place? Is that really what the preference system was designed for?

I have no idea if anyone applied to Cutteslowe (which is a perfectly fine school) as a 2nd preference, or if Cutteslowe is full. I certainly haven't heard of anyone in Lower Wolvercote being offered a place at Cutteslowe as an alternative to Wolvercote. As the report says, they seem to have been offered Botley, Eynsham and North Kidlington.

Another point: the rules have now been changed for 2011 so that priority is given to Lower Wolvercote. The change was meant to be in place for 2010 but the council were slow to implement. This could have led (and could lead in the future) to the ridiculous situation of children on St Peter's Road and Ulfgar Road (adjacent to the school) not getting a place.

What is actually required is more school places throughout North Oxford, and an absolute embargo on new housing until this is resolved.

Thinkingoutloud, Oxford says...
8:01pm Sun 7 Mar 10

Presumably you cannot just keep making a school bigger...there must come a point when it is big enough or the site cannot take any more children If this is the case at Wolvercote what exactly is it that the County Council is supposed to do???

How many children in Wolvercote Primary do not live in Wolvercote?

I suspect it is more 'parental choice' nonsense. I agree with fourmi - local schools for local children...but would the parents of wolvercote be so happy if the school was not a good school.. somehow I doubt it!

Pierre My, East Of Green Road says...
9:08am Wed 10 Mar 10

Committee secretary Andrew Burchardt said: “We don’t want Wolvercote to become a ghost village as far as children are concerned because families feel they have to leave.”...........
....


How did you ever get to be secretary, if the school is full that means that there are plenty of children in the "village" (I thought the school was next to a council estate) so how is it going to turn into a ghost town?

Any One, OX1 says...
10:16am Thu 11 Mar 10

Janet J

There is an excellent bus service in Wolvercote, although most families use one of their cars to drive even to Upper Wolvercote. Check the driveways.

Comments are closed on this article.

Parents and children gather outside Wolvercote Primary School Parents and children gather outside Wolvercote Primary School

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »