News RSS Feed


Cuts put £14.9m flood work in doubt

Environment Agency workers on the River Cherwell clear obstructions as part of anti-flood work Environment Agency workers on the River Cherwell clear obstructions as part of anti-flood work

THE Environment Agency was last night unable to provide any guarantees that £14.9m of planned flood relief work for Oxfordshire will happen.

Flood victims have welcomed the £3.4m spent by the EA on improving the county’s flood defences since a deluge of rain damaged more than 900 homes in July 2007.

The EA has also spent 487 days maintaining 758km of the county’s waterways between 2007 and 2010 at a cost of £852,000.

But victims insisted more needs to be done to make sure their properties are not hit by future floods.

Dr Peter Rawcliffe, of the Oxford Flood Alliance, voiced his disappointment that the EA is proposing to spend just £800,000 this year on its second programme of work to cure flooding in Oxford.

In 2008, the agency forked out £1.8m to fix pinchpoints of floodwater south of the city at Redbridge and to buy flood barriers for Osney Island and South Oxford.

'Money spent on flooding is well spent and saves us damage which is more expensive than the cure'

Dr Peter Rawcliffe

However, funding for the new project, which includes installing culverts in Willow Walk between Botley and West Oxford, is not certain.

Other schemes which could be affected by Government cuts include the £13m Banbury flood protection scheme and an £800,000 project to alleviate flooding from the River Stert in Abingdon.

The EA has set aside £9m for the Banbury project, but is waiting for the guarantees on the rest of the money from other sources, such as councils and local businesses. It is also subject to planning permission.

Dr Rawcliffe, who has been flooded out of his South Hinksey home three times since 2000, said: “The work done so far has been very good and a lot has been achieved.

“However, there’s more still to be done to get us up to anything like a reasonable standard. It’s certainly disappointing no more schemes have been suggested by the EA.

“Money spent on flooding is well spent and saves us damage which is more expensive than the cure.”

Dr Rawcliffe has also criticised the EA for proposing to splash out £2.4m to replace a 104-year-old weir at Northmoor lock in Appleton in the face of strong local opposition.

The EA wants to motorise the lock to prevent lower back injuries to its lockkeeper.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has reduced flood and coastal risk management funding by £30m this year following the Government’s £6bn cut in public spending in this year’s budget.

Thames Valley Flood risk manager Barry Russell said: “Public money at the moment is very tight.

“There is less money around. We are looking at the activities we do and it could be we say our focus has to be on high priority work and we reduce our involvement in lesser things. What we are trying to do is protect the frontline delivery of flood risk management.

“I wouldn’t say anything in the future is guaranteed, everything will be subject to the funding set out after the comprehensive spending review.”

Last week the EA’s chief executive Dr Paul Leinster said financial contributions needed to come from places other than the Government, such as businesses and residents.

Malcolm Willis was forced out of his home in Crawley Road, Witney, for seven months after three inches of floodwater swept into his home.

His road has since benefited from a £50,000 flood bund but a larger scheme but a £3.7m scheme to build large water storage areas nearby was deemed too expensive by the EA.

Mr Willis said: “I think the EA has done quite well actually. I don’t think they can do much more than they have with the financial constraints they’re under.”

Oxford City Council has installed a removable aluminium flood barrier at Bullstake Close, off Botley Road.

The close was one of the first areas of the city to flood in 2007. The £50,000 barrier is quicker and cheaper to put in place than sandbags.

  • Flood works undertaken from 2007 to date:

Abingdon: River Stert Tree Removal – £23,000

Abingdon: Removal of St Helen’s Bridge – £110,000

Abingdon: River Ock Flood Alleviation Study

Ascott under Wychwood: Desilting and flood swale – £54,000

Bicester: Flood Modelling and Mapping Study – £78,000

Bledington: Track raising – £77,000

Bloxham: Redirection of sewage pipe – £5,000

East Hanney: Contribution to Flood Action Group and Self Help – £2,500

Eynsham: Flood Bund– £4,500

Fairford: Flood Alleviation Study

Milton under Wychwood: upstream flood storage on Littlestock Brook – £19,000

Oxford: Short term measures 1 (including Redbridge culverts etc) – £1.8m

Oxford: Flood Alleviation Strategy

Witney: Hailey Road flood bund – £50,000.

Comments(4)

Fat boy says...
9:50am Fri 9 Jul 10

This report says "The EA has also spent 487 days maintaining 758km of the county’s waterways between 2007 and 2010 at a cost of £852,000."
That works out at £1,750 a DAY !!
Not sure haw many people were used, but that seems a hell of a daily rate

abingdonborn&bred says...
10:04am Fri 9 Jul 10

Why not get people claiming unemployment benefit to do river clearence work rather than sit around town making it look untidy

the wizard says...
11:05am Fri 9 Jul 10

The last time it all flooded badly and the river bridge was under threat in Witney, Cameron flew out to a "prior engagement" abroad. Doubt if he was too intrested then while in opposition, so I'm doubtfull as to whether his ministers will worry too much now. Its an ongoing problem that nobody really wants to deal with because of the huge amounts of money involved. The truth is that rural Oxfordshire is used as a flood plain to save London. If there were floods in London, the House of Commons could be under water, and that won't do, would it. But of course its ok for us to have inches, maybe feet of water in our homes so numerous MP's can get TV coverage saying how terrible it is, and all the spin that goes with it, while they conduct their orchestrated visits to the effected areas. Shame they don't spend as much time dealing with the problem in the first place, and in so doing save countless families the heartache of seeing their homes destroyed.

Sid Hunt says...
11:17am Fri 9 Jul 10

abingdonborn&bred wrote:
Why not get people claiming unemployment benefit to do river clearence work rather than sit around town making it look untidy
Capital idea!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree