News RSS Feed


Advice centre under threat


A CHARITY which helps people who are at risk of losing their homes has warned it could close if county council funding is withdrawn.

The Rose Hill and Donnington Advice Centre, which worked with more than 1,200 people last year, gets about 13 per cent of its income from Oxfordshire County Council.

However, it has been told that a policy change, brought about by impending cuts, means its grant could be withdrawn from April next year.

The council has already agreed £13m of spending cuts this year – but plans to make another £203m of saving over the next five years.

The chairman of the centre’s trustees, Dr Patrick Lawrence, made the closure warning in an open letter to county council leader Keith Mitchell.

He said: “Is it appropriate for the council to withhold this small sum, when it allows us to achieve so much for needful people?

“Lacking this small sum may force us to close our service to our communities, some of whom are among the 20 per cent most deprived areas in England.”

Dr Lawrence, from Iffley, estimated the centre, which has given free advice for 20 years, saved its clients about £115,000 last year.

It operates drop-in services on weekday mornings at its premises in Ashurst Way, Rose Hill, on weekday mornings.

People can walk in off the street and get free advice if they fear their homes are at risk of being repossessed.

Dr Lawrence’s letter to Mr Mitchell continued: “The city council funds some 60 per cent of our costs, and the county council about 13 per cent.

“Running costs amount to slightly more than £100,000 a year.

“To stay afloat, we depend on gifts and our own many fundraising events. We struggle, and it would be preferable to expand our services in these hard times.

“Last autumn we were warned of a change of policy within your council. The effect could, apparently, be no county grant after April 2011.

“Do your policy makers not appreciate the savings we make within your budget? Is it not a good return?”

Dr Lawrence said that the centre’s services provided important help to vulnerable people in the community.

He added: “Such relief to individuals, of course, has a welcome benefit for the whole family and, indeed, the local economy.

“With their worries abated, the family’s welfare is enhanced.

“Where we can stay an eviction, you don’t have the pain and expense of splitting up a family, arranging for the city to rehouse adults, finding shelter for the children, getting to work from a new house and making children go to unfamiliar schools.”

Council spokesman Louise Mendonca said: “We have a commitment to helping to maintain good advice services and we are reviewing a number of strategies but no decisions have been made.”


Comments(9)

Resident of Oxford says...
9:13pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Maybe Oxford City Council could contribute - they are recruiting new staff all the time to compliment the 1200+ employees so money is no object here!

itsmick says...
10:42pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Taxpayers have been paying most (nearly all) of the £100K annual costs !! However do they spend that much ? Not all in wages I sincerely hope. We have enough self-serving charities already.

Andrew:Oxford says...
11:17pm Sat 31 Jul 10

£100K spent to save £115K per annum appears to be incredibly poor value for money. Perhaps it would be better for the individuals to offer their specialist knowledge of the housing sector as volunteers for the Citizens Advice Bureau and to wind-down the competing service. I tend to be very suspicious of charity groups - they tend to be operated for the self-importance of the trustees rather than to benefit the people.

The New Realist says...
9:17am Sun 1 Aug 10

Resident of Oxford wrote:
Maybe Oxford City Council could contribute - they are recruiting new staff all the time to compliment the 1200+ employees so money is no object here!
Unfortunately they are making cuts and not employing. Services will suffer across the UK to make up for the last few years of extravagance, and everyone is going to lose out somewhere along the line to bring this country back into the black.

digdog says...
12:40pm Sun 1 Aug 10

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
£100K spent to save £115K per annum appears to be incredibly poor value for money. Perhaps it would be better for the individuals to offer their specialist knowledge of the housing sector as volunteers for the Citizens Advice Bureau and to wind-down the competing service. I tend to be very suspicious of charity groups - they tend to be operated for the self-importance of the trustees rather than to benefit the people.
They do a lot more than save their clients' money. Surely people being able to stay in their own homes rather than pushing up prices in an already overcrowded rental market or taking up social housing that is needed by others is important? The article doesn't specify how much of the £100,000 is provided by the council but if they are having fund raising avtivities etc then it can't be all of it.

digdog says...
12:42pm Sun 1 Aug 10

digdog wrote:
Andrew:Oxford wrote: £100K spent to save £115K per annum appears to be incredibly poor value for money. Perhaps it would be better for the individuals to offer their specialist knowledge of the housing sector as volunteers for the Citizens Advice Bureau and to wind-down the competing service. I tend to be very suspicious of charity groups - they tend to be operated for the self-importance of the trustees rather than to benefit the people.
They do a lot more than save their clients' money. Surely people being able to stay in their own homes rather than pushing up prices in an already overcrowded rental market or taking up social housing that is needed by others is important? The article doesn't specify how much of the £100,000 is provided by the council but if they are having fund raising avtivities etc then it can't be all of it.
I beg your pardon, the article does say how much funding the council provides- 13% which if my maths are correct is £13000, not an enormous sum to stop peoples homes being repossed.

itsmick says...
5:18pm Sun 1 Aug 10

Don't forget that the City Council gives 60% of the funding - another £69,000 of taxpayer's money !! Amazing that so much can be spent on so little.

Andrew:Oxford says...
8:42pm Sun 1 Aug 10

digdog wrote:
Andrew:Oxford wrote:
£100K spent to save £115K per annum appears to be incredibly poor value for money. Perhaps it would be better for the individuals to offer their specialist knowledge of the housing sector as volunteers for the Citizens Advice Bureau and to wind-down the competing service. I tend to be very suspicious of charity groups - they tend to be operated for the self-importance of the trustees rather than to benefit the people.
They do a lot more than save their clients' money. Surely people being able to stay in their own homes rather than pushing up prices in an already overcrowded rental market or taking up social housing that is needed by others is important? The article doesn't specify how much of the £100,000 is provided by the council but if they are having fund raising avtivities etc then it can't be all of it.
Well, the article is really quite clear. Of the £100K, £13K is provided by the County Council and £60K is provided by the City Council... Closing and offering to volunteer for CAB instead would be far better - they are the people that are the recommended first point of contact by the majority of banks. No point duplicating property rental, heating, lighting, IT hire when people already do the job well.

LadyPenelope says...
11:57am Mon 2 Aug 10

There are other avenues to turn to if you think you're going to lose your home. CAB and Shelter can both give the exact same advice, so the council has to question whether this charity is really needed.


From left, Sharon Bates, chairman of trustees Dr Patrick Lawrence, Carole Roberts and Julie Woodley at  Rose Hill and Donnington Advice Centre From left, Sharon Bates, chairman of trustees Dr Patrick Lawrence, Carole Roberts and Julie Woodley at Rose Hill and Donnington Advice Centre

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses