News RSS Feed


Former GP calls for the right to die

Dr Ann McPherson Dr Ann McPherson

A TERMINALLY ill former Oxford GP who wants the ‘right to die’ is preparing to take on the Government to change the law on assisted suicide.

At the moment, the act of assisting the terminally ill to kill themsleves is forbidden by the 1961 Suicide Act.

But Dr Ann McPherson, who has been told she is dying of pancreatic cancer, wants the right to choose to end her life should the time come.

She has set up a group of 12 health professionals, the first of its kind, to lobby for patients to be given the right to die.

Dr McPherson, who worked at a practice in Beaumont Street, Oxford city centre, for 30 years, said: “I don’t know if I would choose to take my own life when it comes to it.

“But I do know that when I feel I am becoming a burden, I would like the choice to be able to decide to die at home, surrounded by my loved ones.”

Dr McPherson will launch Healthcare Professionals for Change on Wednesday at the London headquarters of the King’s Fund, a healthcare think tank, in Cavendish Square.

It is the only official group supporting the right to die to be made up of health professionals.

Dr McPherson said that when she worked as a GP she was regularly faced with terminally ill patients who wanted the option of a “dignified death” but could do nothing to help them.

She added: “I wrote a piece on my personal view on the right to die in a medical journal 18 months ago. I got a lot of response from other health professionals who said they supported what I was saying.

“The aim of the group is to represent the views of the many professionals who support a change in the law to allow the the choice of safeguarded assisted dying.”

But Roger Burne, a retired Cowley Road GP and now assistant priest of Church of the Holy Family in Blackbird Leys, said the issue was fraught with difficulty.

Mr Burne, a former medical director of Helen & Douglas House, a respite and end-of-life hospice, said: “It’s asking the doctor, whose role is to prolong life, but not at any cost, to be complicit in the death of a patient.

“The law doesn’t allow us to go around causing the death of other people, even when it’s consensual.

“Life is for God. It’s not for us to determine how and when it ends.”

Almost all of the major professional health bodies oppose any change in the law which would allow doctors to help a patient end their life, including the British Medical Association (BMA), the Royal College of General Practitioners, the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal Society of Medicine.

Dr Vivienne Nathanson, head of BMA Sciences and Ethics, said the association had a firm policy on the issue.

She said: “We are opposed to the legalisation of assisted dying and we are not lobbying for any change in the law.”

But last year the Royal College of Nursing dropped its offical oppostion to the law change.

Comments(8)

Green123 says...
9:31am Mon 11 Oct 10

“Life is for God. It’s not for us to determine how and when it ends.”

But what if you are not a religious person? I am an atheist, so do not therefore accept this statement as fact. Surely decisions about one's life should be made by someone that actually exists, i.e. by a medical professional and by the patient themselves, not by an imaginary deity.

CLLR KEN TIWARI says...
9:47am Mon 11 Oct 10

Dear Dr McPherson

I fully agree with you, for the reasons-
your thinking is right, i think ?

If i can remember Harold Macmillan's-Governme
nt was split on this Act.-
my mum-(the one raised me) wrote to her representatives, nothing happen then?
I wish you all the luck, to take this concern as far as you could,-

Cllr Ken Tiwari (parish) R&S,Oxford,

Oxford resident says...
12:20pm Mon 11 Oct 10

Well said.

If "Life is for God", why did God make life so unendurable for so many people and their loved ones - suffering from cancer, Alzheimer's, heart disease, and many other extremely agonising ailments?

Good luck to Dr McPherson's campaign.

Sophia says...
1:53pm Mon 11 Oct 10

I totally agree with Dr McPherson and wish the same right for myself and those near to me when in extremis. As for Dr Bigot and his 'God'. Is that one of the christian gods - but not that of the Quakers, since they have no ban on euthansia? Bhudda tolerated suicide as did Roman gods. What Dr Bigot means is this: there is only one religion and I want to impose it on everyone. All other religions are false.

ITs time the British state stopped allowing a faith that so few share nowadays to boss us all around

Eddy Grundy says...
3:22pm Mon 11 Oct 10

“Life is for God. It’s not for us to determine how and when it ends.”

And yet doctors do act against this by PROLONGING life whenever they can. Can't that be said to be US determining life and not god?

Prolonging life can be cruel if "quality if life" is ignored and people are made to suffer until the end and not be allowed a dignified death.

Good luck to you Dr McPherson.

Apu Nahasapeemapetilon says...
4:38pm Mon 11 Oct 10

This government needs to sort themselves out. A life belongs to the person and nobody else. If they (the person) wish to end it and require some help it has nothing to do with anyone else. If this government wish to take responsibility and dictate what we can and can't do (like our parents) then they (the Government) can also take care of us through our lives should we choose not to work. So Davey Boy what is it to be, you being our Nanny and taking care of us, or us taking care of ourselves and making our own decisions?.

Berty says...
8:56pm Mon 11 Oct 10

This is such a personal decision, and as such shouldn't be something that has to be dictated by other peoples' idea of "God".
My thoughts are with you Ann.

mandate says...
11:34am Tue 12 Oct 10

God does'nt really come into the equation for people who don't worship him/her.
If doctors can offer a painless and dignified death to persons of sound mind who request it, then surely this would be an act of mercy.
I think all people would be inclined to agree that their god is merciful, and a kind god would'nt want to see anybody suffering against their will.
So naturely this choice should be offered regardless of if you beleive in god or not.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree