News RSS Feed


Fears university will 'overdevelop'

RESIDENTS are calling for a “strategic plan” and new parking measures for Headington following the approval of a major university development.

Plans for the controversial Oxford University campus in Old Road in Headington were passed by Oxford City Council on Wednesday night.

The council’s planning review committee gave the £57m scheme the go-ahead after the original approval was called in for review by a group of 18 councillors.

Concerns had been raised over the “overbearing” design of the three-storey buildings and lack of parking for the 150 extra staff.

And residents now want a plan drawn up to control any future development, such as the university’s plans for the Park Road hospital site.

City councillor Tony Brett, who chaired the meeting, said: “The fact that everybody had their chance to get their views across is good, and there were very strong arguments both ways.

“Nothing is without its downsides but the committee decided on balance to approve.We’d like to see a controlled parking zone (CPZ) in the Divinity Road area. The university can offer money but cannot implement a CPZ.”

Oxford University has agreed to pay an increased sum of £257,000 towards transport infrastructure measures which could include a CPZ permit parking scheme.

Oxfordshire County Council are responsible for implementing CPZs. Residents were also concerned about the risk of flooding of nearby Boundary Brook and Lye Valley, a site of special scientific interest.

But three tanks have been included in the plans to collect surface water and release it at a controlled rate.

The buildings will house the new Nuffield Department of Medicine and the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology which is moving from London. Four existing buildings will be demolished to make way for the development.

Prof William James, the university’s pro-vice chancellor for planning and resource allocation, said the university was “an important part of the local economy” and the proposal formed an essential part of its continued research.

The development will be used for research into conditions such as arthritis and dementia.

Headington Action Group chairman Patrick Coulter said: “We are not against research but what we need is a strategic plan for the area so that all these developments can be looked at properly.

“Otherwise they are just ad hoc incremental decisions.”

City councillor David Rundle echoed this. He said: “I think the decision was made blindfolded and I regret we’re looking at one big proposal which is actually a small detail in the bigger picture.

“I wish there could have been a more strategic view, but as a councillor for the area we have to accept the result.

“It is now my job to work with residents and the university to try to minimise the negative impacts this could have.

“People in Headington recognise the advantages of the university but with those advantages come problems.”

Comments(4)

Andrew:Oxford says...
7:22am Fri 2 Sep 11

The CPRE would never approve it, but the area south of Grenoble Road, not far from the Science Park close to the potential local rail network, would be ideal for the science and research industry.

This land in Headington could then be used for housing instead.

Your_Kidding says...
7:56am Fri 2 Sep 11

Prof William James, the university’s pro-vice chancellor for planning and resource allocation, said the university was “an important part of the local economy” and the proposal formed an essential part of its continued research.


Yeah, it might be an important part of the local economy but it is not the only part nor does it seem to take into account the need for housing people.

cweb says...
12:12pm Fri 2 Sep 11

The lack of parking (and problems it creates with workers parking in residential areas, and the need for CPZs) is I feel caused by Oxford City Council's policy of actively restricting available non-residential parking as a means to reducing reliance on private cars.

So, where installing a large underground car park might seem sensible where you're increasing the number of employee's on a site, it wouldn't get planning permission, even though it'd prevent other problems locally.

Of course, not helped by the inadequate P&R provision on that side of the city and bus services to the JR/Churchill - I've had to park in uncontrolled residiential areas before because Thornhill was *completely* full.

CLLR KEN TIWARI says...
11:44am Sat 3 Sep 11

It's really sad to read this word-Resident, and they have something to say against good stutents, who may be looking for place to live-and-study, and no_more;

This may be wrong word, for complainant to call themselves- a- Resident ?
I think all Residents are good people, they should'nt attack students, in-fact, we all should- encourage students to study-further !
Cllr Ken tiwari (parish-of-R&S/oxfor
d).

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree