Report this comment
  • "
    L0RD PETER MCVEY 0X2 6EG wrote:
    jacoxford wrote:
    A lot of the cars are people park and riding. I watch them every day parking and getting on the bus to Oxford.
    Do you really Jac from Oxford. I don't believe you. Or are you Jac from Kidlington?
    I really don't care whether you believe me or not. It happens. Just for the record, I was jac from Oxford when I registered with OM. I now live in Kidlington."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Resident to get answers at last

Michael Makepeace Michael Makepeace

Kidlington resident Michael Makepeace grew so “sick and tired” of police cars parking outside his home he fired off a series of questions to officials.

But his efforts to find out more about who was leaving their cars outside his Oxford Road home were labelled “vexatious” by police.

Now, after twice being refused the information, Mr Makepeace has finally won his year-long battle for the details.

Mr Makepeace says police staff and visitors have been using the service road outside his home – near the force’s headquarters – as a “long-term car park”.

The final straw came when a driver, who Mr Makepeace claims was visiting Thames Valley Police headquarters in Oxford Road, blocked the access to his drive.

He requested information about the incident from police, using the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act, so that he could build evidence to lodge a complaint.

But police deemed his request “vexatious” – purely to cause annoyance – and turned him down.

Mr Makepeace denied this and took the case to the Information Commissioner. When it was turned down again, he appealed to the Information Rights Tribunal.

Now, a year after the original incident, the tribunal has found in Mr Makepeace’s favour and he has won the right to see details.

Mr Makepeace said: “We have had a long-standing problem with police parking on the service roads.

“It obstructs the views of the road and makes it extremely difficult for people to get out of their driveways. It’s dangerous.

“Police have got nearly 400 parking spaces on their site but they do not seem to be able to manage it. They were using our service road as a long-term car park.”

Mr Makepeace said he had tried to lodge a complaint with the police car park manager after his driveway was obstructed by an unmarked car he believes was connected to the police. After being turned down, but using the car’s registration number, he requested the name of the driver, the name of the car park manager and the station’s logbook.

Mr Makepeace, who has taken a series of photos showing marked police cars parked in the road, said: “People have to sign in and that would prove that it was a Thames Valley Police officer that parked outside my house.

“I wanted to get information to make a formal complaint. Without it, I have got no proof. It was a single request and it was not persistent. It was not vexatious.

“I am just disappointed in the state of management up there. They seem to think they are special, rather than public servants.”

Police spokesman Leo Tarring said: “We respect the decision of the Information Rights Tribunal and are currently in the process of providing a response to the original request. It would be inappropriate to comment further.”

Thames Valley Police classed 10 FoI requests as vexatious in 2010, and 23 in 2011 – information gleaned after an FoI request.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree