Flats to go ahead after larger scheme rejected

Plans for 55 student rooms to the back of homes in West Oxford will be built, after a 74-flat scheme was rejected.

Oxford City Council backed a two-storey plan for 55 flats in Mill Street in February, but threw out the three-storey plan for 74 flats.

Developer WE Black Ltd appealed against the latter, but this has now been rejected by the Planning Inspectorate. Nik Lyzba, who represented the firm for planning consultants JPPC, said of the smaller plan: “It would certainly be the intention that they will proceed.”

Both developments were for land between the railway line and the street for language college students as young as 16.

Inspector Jane Miles said the three-storey plan would “cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the residential environment”.

Resident Mike Magee, 62, said: “I’m very pleased, three storeys was a storey too far. We are still not happy about the two-storey building, but it is a done deal.”

And Brendan Carter, 65, said: “I’d rather not have the two storeys at all, it is still too big, it is monolithic.”

Councillor Tony Brett, who led the appeal fight, said: “I am very pleased. We have to use the limited amount of land we have in Oxford – the two-storey scheme is less intrusive.”

Related links

But Miss Miles ordered the council to pay yet-to-be-decided appeal costs due to its “generalised remarks” when it refused the larger plan.

Comments(2)

Feelingsmatter says...
9:58pm Fri 22 Jun 12

Why are there so many stories that we can't comment on? I was looking forward to laying in to GPs who earn about £100,000 and object to paying a little more for a PENSION which is three times MORE than I will earn this, or next, or any year? My GP is excellent, and I really rate her, but why should she retire on more than three times what I get for working full time?

Andrew:Oxford says...
10:26am Sat 23 Jun 12

Feelingsmatter wrote:
Why are there so many stories that we can't comment on? I was looking forward to laying in to GPs who earn about £100,000 and object to paying a little more for a PENSION which is three times MORE than I will earn this, or next, or any year? My GP is excellent, and I really rate her, but why should she retire on more than three times what I get for working full time?
Not sure what's wrong with it.

Maybe they dont' have the staff to monitor the comments at the moment, so are only opening the option on fairly neutral stories.

In particular, stories concerning Clinton Pugh, Temple Cowley Pool and the local councillors are often robustly moderated - and these are all locked for comments at the moment.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree