<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/resources/xsl/"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Oxford Times | Letters</title>
    <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/</link>
    <description>The Oxford Times /news/opinions/letters/</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:59:07 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:59:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/rssterms/</docs>
    <generator>M6</generator>
    <managingEditor>nvincent@newsquest.co.uk (Nigel Vincent)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@digitalmedia.newsquest.co.uk (Tim Joy)</webMaster>
    
    <atom:link href="http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
           <title>People in blindfolds are looking for new probation offices</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470919.People_in_blindfolds_are_looking_for_new_probation_offices/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – Regarding the leader &#40;June 25) in which you stated that Thames Valley Probation &#40;TVP) should be able to find a more suitable place than Mill St for their large probation centre.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:21:30 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">06f0c540ced15e0adce4c9e63bd3433f</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Pedestrianisation will put city out of bounds</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470849.Pedestrianisation_will_put_city_out_of_bounds/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – It is not very many years since the great campaigns to get better accessibility for the disabled won several triumphs — public places &#40;including restaurants, pubs, etc) have now established
  accessible toilet facilities; lifts and other aids are much more frequent.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:14:13 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">6135e8e4ad2b288b18536aebf99f01b7</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>It isn't an either/or</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470855.It_isn_t_an_either_or/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  It isn’t an either/or Sir – Tom Burns &#40;letter, June 25) is very precise in his judgement of exactly what is right and wrong in Margaret Coombs’s defence of Warneford Meadow. I should like to point
  out a fundamental error in what Professor Burns has to say on the matter.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:14:53 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">d74b71dafcb95aa7d43aac77b6d048b4</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Need for green space</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470860.Need_for_green_space/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – How ill informed is Tom Burns &#40;letter, June 25) to state that NHS managers understand the vital need for green spaces, and in the same letter, want to sell Warneford Meadow for housing
  development.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:15:24 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">dce3889200b75f4a0627874a0666da01</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Fresh air important</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470866.Fresh_air_important/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – The problem confronting Professor Tom Burns CBE and his colleagues at Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Mental Health NHS Trust &#40;letter, June 25) is that they will need new buildings and the
  upgrading of wards every ten or 15 years or so. We must all continue to campaign for much more adequate funding for the care of people with mental health needs. It is the Government’s
  responsibility.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:15:58 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">3d84c4acfb2f06091e1007398563b3c7</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Green space protects</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470872.Green_space_protects/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – Tom Burns rightly points out that those admitted to psychiatric wards today are too ill to benefit from strolls on Warneford Meadow. But it’s a shame he thinks the public need for green
  spaces is at odds with providing decent inpatient facilities and that, without the sale of land bought in 1918 &#40;‘speculative’ only with hindsight), the NHS can’t fulfil its duties.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:16:35 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">3fe3c2f98a4b13f3f25bbba4afebbeed</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>No satisfactory answer</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470874.No_satisfactory_answer/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – John Tanner &#40;letter, June 25) is right to criticise the Conservative-controlled county council’s high-handed imposition of controlled parking zones on Oxford, where it has absolutely no
  electoral mandate.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:17:07 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">4b8654f843ddc18c67b489f21807b724</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Heavy price to pay</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470880.Heavy_price_to_pay/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – We have until July 9 to oppose the county council’s plans for controlled parking zones in East Oxford.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:17:44 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">d3ead0110dd13361b44dbdbb989b262b</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Is it art?</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470883.Is_it_art_/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – Much as I endorse Julian le Vay's commendation of the improved towpath north of Osney Bridge off Botley road, &#40;letter, June 25) as well as Christopher Gray’s recent coverage, however: Eyes to
  the left, the sun is setting in the West — tranquillity Eyes to the right — graffitti!
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:18:12 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">145e2f152d2407988c1e2dab9566b7cd</guid>
           
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Costs and benefits</title>
           <link>http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/opinions/letters/4470890.Costs_and_benefits/?ref=rss</link>
           <description>
  Sir – Is it not time that both the Oxfordshire county and the Oxford city councils conducted a thorough, impartial survey of the costs, as well as the benefits, of Oxford Brookes’ University’s
  presence in the city? It could start by looking at the projected huge expansion of the Gipsy Lane site which current amendments leave largely unchanged in terms of overall scope and ‘massing’ and
  potentialities for congestion and noise pollution.
</description>
           <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:18:40 +0100</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">c144cb42957684f401489c76dbd492e0</guid>
           
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>