When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
6:30am Monday 22nd June 2009 in
THAMES Water wants to restrict the flow of water to non-paying customers.
The company, which is currently prevented on public health grounds from cutting off household water supplies, wants the Government to change the law to let it reduce the supply to a trickle in certain cases to “inconvenience” customers who refuse to pay up.
Currently there are 18,000 properties in Oxfordshire in debt to the company. Such a penalty is already in use in parts of Australia, where flow-restricting devices provide properties with just enough water to flush the toilet or fill a jug, to meet health and safety requirements.
Thames Water has written to the all-party House of Commons environment committee, which is conducting an inquiry into the Government’s Flood and Water management Bill.
The letter said the devices used in Australia “inconvenience the customer to prioritise payment of their bill, while still allowing a level of water to flow that meets public health needs”.
Thames Water director Richard Aylard said: “It’s worth looking at to see if something can be done, although there are practical concerns about how it would work, in terms of allowing enough water for hygiene, and how you fit these restrictors. “It would be an absolute last resort when everything else failed – and in each case we would need to get a court order, so people could make their case.”
Mr Aylard said non-payment of water bills across the UK cost paying customers an average of £11 a year.
He said: “A certain number of customers simply refuse to pay their bills.
“We can’t cut them off, so we’re drawing MPs’ attention to the problem of bad debt, which is a big and growing one.
“We need to sort out the ‘can’t pays’ – who we can help – from the hardcore ‘won’t pays’, people who put two fingers up to the rest of our customers.
“It’s not about those who can’t pay their bills. For anyone who can’t pay, there are various options.”
A spokesman for the Department for the Enviropnment, Food and Rural Affairs said the independent review into charging for household water was “specifically looking” at the problem of bad debt and was expected to deliver interim recommendations soon.
Tony Woodley, who last year won a four-year battle with Thames Water to have a water main diverted from beneath his home in Iffley Road, East Oxford, criticised the plans.
He said: “People should pay their bills but there may be circumstances where they can’t.
“As far as I’m concerned, water is a natural utility, that should be available to everybody.
“It comes from the sky, goes into the ground and Thames Water fill a big hole up and pump water to you, and want to charge a lot of money for it.”
Dilys Cale, 75, of Upper Road, Kennington, said: “I don’t think you should be able to stop people’s water completely.
“But there has got to be some way of making them pay, as it just isn’t fair on everyone else.”
Comments(12)
LadyPenelope
says...
7:54am Mon 22 Jun 09
DanOxford
says...
8:09am Mon 22 Jun 09
Zimmer
says...
8:30am Mon 22 Jun 09
Concerned one
says...
8:32am Mon 22 Jun 09
Cluck79
says...
10:36am Mon 22 Jun 09
online_reader
says...
11:56am Mon 22 Jun 09
jamiek
says...
1:05pm Mon 22 Jun 09
cottage2day
says...
1:40pm Mon 22 Jun 09
disco80
says...
7:24pm Mon 22 Jun 09
ex-B.G.S (Priory)
says...
7:31am Wed 24 Jun 09
AngelB
says...
6:57pm Wed 24 Jun 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire now!
Search Now »
Oxfordshire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
William Windsor says...
6:46am Mon 22 Jun 09
If the water companies would guarantee to pass the saving of £11.00 back to customers it might not be a bad idea, but you can be sure even if they are allowed to fit them those who do pay will see no saving.