Bicester RSS Feed


Water pressure off to pressurise non-payers


THAMES Water wants to restrict the flow of water to non-paying customers.

The company, which is currently prevented on public health grounds from cutting off household water supplies, wants the Government to change the law to let it reduce the supply to a trickle in certain cases to “inconvenience” customers who refuse to pay up.

Currently there are 18,000 properties in Oxfordshire in debt to the company. Such a penalty is already in use in parts of Australia, where flow-restricting devices provide properties with just enough water to flush the toilet or fill a jug, to meet health and safety requirements.

Thames Water has written to the all-party House of Commons environment committee, which is conducting an inquiry into the Government’s Flood and Water management Bill.

The letter said the devices used in Australia “inconvenience the customer to prioritise payment of their bill, while still allowing a level of water to flow that meets public health needs”.

Thames Water director Richard Aylard said: “It’s worth looking at to see if something can be done, although there are practical concerns about how it would work, in terms of allowing enough water for hygiene, and how you fit these restrictors. “It would be an absolute last resort when everything else failed – and in each case we would need to get a court order, so people could make their case.”

Mr Aylard said non-payment of water bills across the UK cost paying customers an average of £11 a year.

He said: “A certain number of customers simply refuse to pay their bills.

“We can’t cut them off, so we’re drawing MPs’ attention to the problem of bad debt, which is a big and growing one.

“We need to sort out the ‘can’t pays’ – who we can help – from the hardcore ‘won’t pays’, people who put two fingers up to the rest of our customers.

“It’s not about those who can’t pay their bills. For anyone who can’t pay, there are various options.”

A spokesman for the Department for the Enviropnment, Food and Rural Affairs said the independent review into charging for household water was “specifically looking” at the problem of bad debt and was expected to deliver interim recommendations soon.

Tony Woodley, who last year won a four-year battle with Thames Water to have a water main diverted from beneath his home in Iffley Road, East Oxford, criticised the plans.

He said: “People should pay their bills but there may be circumstances where they can’t.

“As far as I’m concerned, water is a natural utility, that should be available to everybody.

“It comes from the sky, goes into the ground and Thames Water fill a big hole up and pump water to you, and want to charge a lot of money for it.”

Dilys Cale, 75, of Upper Road, Kennington, said: “I don’t think you should be able to stop people’s water completely.

“But there has got to be some way of making them pay, as it just isn’t fair on everyone else.”

Comments(12)

William Windsor says...
6:46am Mon 22 Jun 09

Mr Aylard said non-payment of water bills across the UK cost paying customers an average of £11 a year.

If the water companies would guarantee to pass the saving of £11.00 back to customers it might not be a bad idea, but you can be sure even if they are allowed to fit them those who do pay will see no saving.


LadyPenelope says...
7:54am Mon 22 Jun 09

If it costs the average customer £11 a year due to customers who won't pay, then I wonder how much it costs us in all the water lost due to poorly maintained pipes, leaks etc...?

I agree restricting water flow though!

DanOxford says...
8:09am Mon 22 Jun 09

Tom Woodley:

“As far as I’m concerned, water is a natural utility, that should be available to everybody.

“It comes from the sky, goes into the ground and Thames Water fill a big hole up and pump water to you, and want to charge a lot of money for it.”


No problem Tom- buy a large water butt and wait for it to rain, thus providing you with free water.

Buy a second container and use this to store all the sewage you produce in a year.

It's a wonder we hadn't all realised earlier that we don't need these costly services provided bt Thames Water.


Zimmer says...
8:30am Mon 22 Jun 09

Get a meter fitted you only pay for what you use I saved a fortune. As Dan said, I've two large water buts one for the collection of rain the other bath and waste water from the house which is used for the garden and washing the car etc. Not a pressure washer in sight which uses an enormous amount of water. Of course you have to make an effort but in this day and age that is against most peoples way of life unless the're spoon fed!!!!!

Concerned one says...
8:32am Mon 22 Jun 09

Of course everyone should pay their bills, however, according to reports Thames Water will announce record profits of more than £610m while planning to increase household bills by 17% above inflation over the next five years.

Next year bills will go up by 10.5% followed by further rises in the coming years. With increases such as this and council tax increase of 4.5% many will find they have difficulty in paying.

Cluck79 says...
10:36am Mon 22 Jun 09

I use a water meter, and Ihave reduced my bills by £30 per month, and I don't use my water any less, I would recommend it to anyone, even people I konw in shared houses have seen a reduction.

online_reader says...
11:56am Mon 22 Jun 09

@Zimmer - I collect rain water but how do you collect waste water in a water butt? Mine all comes out at ground level - would I need a plumber?

jamiek says...
1:05pm Mon 22 Jun 09

I think youll find a pressure washer uses less water than a hose Zimmer!!!!

cottage2day says...
1:40pm Mon 22 Jun 09

Pay the bills, wont have a problem, simple as that.

disco80 says...
7:24pm Mon 22 Jun 09

why does it cost all of us £11 a year when thames water make profits of £400 million a year? maybe if they couldnt pass the cost onto us but lost it from the profits they would sort it out alot quicker. i wander if any leaky pipes will be fixed this year aswell!!!!

ex-B.G.S (Priory) says...
7:31am Wed 24 Jun 09

"Everything comes at a price" - "You Gets what you pays for" - So every-one should pay for what they get!!!!!!

AngelB says...
6:57pm Wed 24 Jun 09

Fair enough if people won't pay then restriction is fine. Doubt any TW customers will see the £11 coming off their bills anytime soon though!


Dilys Cale Dilys Cale

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses