Churches given £30m to ease burden of VAT (From The Oxford Times)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Churches given £30m to ease burden of VAT
10:30am Saturday 19th May 2012 in Oxford
By Andrew Smith, Business Editor. Call me on 01865 425460
CHURCH leaders in Oxfordshire have welcomed news that the Government is to put £30m into a special fund to offset the impact of changes to VAT laws.
Chancellor George Osborne caused a storm of protest – led by people in Oxfordshire – when he revealed in the Budget in March that work to alter listed buildings, including churches, would be subject to VAT from October.
Previously, alterations had been VAT exempt, although maintenance work was subject to the tax, with the grey area being the replacement of church roofs targeted by lead thieves.
Churches angry about the change in the tax rules raised a petition on the issue which was sent to Prime Minister and Witney MP David Cameron.
Mr Osborne has now agreed to provide an extra £30m for the Listed Places of Worship grant scheme, which will mean churches will be able to reclaim any additional VAT costs generated by alterations.
Jeff West, a member of the Church of England’s Oxford diocesan advisory committee for the care of churches, said: “We are delighted. This will go a very long way to answering the concerns of churches with listed buildings to look after.
“Lots of churches are trying to adapt their facilities by installing loos and kitchens and this would have added 20 per cent to the cost of doing that.
“Most of the country’s Grade I listed buildings are looked after by church congregations and the original announcement was an awful shock.”
The Listed Places of Worship scheme, which already benefits from a £12m a year Government grant to offset the impact of VAT on maintenance work, will now be boosted to £42m, guaranteed until the next General Election in three years’ time.
Banbury MP and Church Commissioner Tony Baldry, who held talks with Mr Osborne about the issue, has also ensured the application process will be speeded up, with requests for the grants going straight to the Treasury, rather than via other Government departments.
Mr Baldry said: “I think this is a generous amount from the Chancellor, given the present financial circumstances.”
But the Rev David Randell, vicar of St Mary’s Church, in Warkworth, near Banbury, who struggled to raise money for a new roof after thieves stole lead worth £100,000 in August last year, was more sceptical.
He said: “Applying for this grant can be a bit of a lottery. We will apply for every bit of money we can get but we won’t hold our breath. Actually reducing VAT for churches would be a fairer system.”
Comments(10)
Dilligaf2010
says...
11:53am Sat 19 May 12
sparro wrote:That's about the size of it, now they're going to get richer.
churches are the richest people on earth, then the university`s
Vernon Spools
says...
2:34pm Sat 19 May 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
4:51pm Sat 19 May 12
Vernon Spools wrote:But the Churches are already worth a fortune, they don't need any assistance from the tax payer.
If churches are helped into carrying out maintenance and adaptions they spend money, money on local builders who in turn need the work and money. This is what the economy needs to kick start it. Only a small step with Churches, but don't knock it.
Bookworm44
says...
6:49pm Sat 19 May 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
7:12pm Sat 19 May 12
Bookworm44 wrote:I'm aware that individual churches have to fend for themselves, but that is due to the fact that the powers that be prefer to keep a tight reign on the coffers, which is wrong.
Individual churches are not rich. We are a small church with only about 60 members and have to pay what is called the Parrish share which covers amonst other things the vicar's salary and pay to heat, light and insure the building. We have to raise £75,000 to repair our bell tower by applying for grants and fund raising events. Another 20% makes it very hard.
gymrat34
says...
1:06pm Sun 20 May 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Having wealth (being worth a fortune) and having money to spend are completely different.
Vernon Spools wrote:But the Churches are already worth a fortune, they don't need any assistance from the tax payer.
If churches are helped into carrying out maintenance and adaptions they spend money, money on local builders who in turn need the work and money. This is what the economy needs to kick start it. Only a small step with Churches, but don't knock it.
custard_snatcher
says...
4:24pm Mon 21 May 12
cuckoo
says...
6:09pm Mon 21 May 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Good point Dilligaf...many, many tax payers are aethesist!!
Bookworm44 wrote:I'm aware that individual churches have to fend for themselves, but that is due to the fact that the powers that be prefer to keep a tight reign on the coffers, which is wrong.
Individual churches are not rich. We are a small church with only about 60 members and have to pay what is called the Parrish share which covers amonst other things the vicar's salary and pay to heat, light and insure the building. We have to raise £75,000 to repair our bell tower by applying for grants and fund raising events. Another 20% makes it very hard.
LORD PETER MACVEY 0X2 6EG
says...
8:27pm Tue 22 May 12
custard_snatcher wrote:To be honest we have Big Buddah 2,600 years old, Baby Jesus son of a VIRGIN 2,000 years old, then Muhammed Ali a newcomer only invented 1,400 years ago, does anybody really believe in all this rubbish. How can the government give so much of our money away to things invented like this. How about a grant for the Vampire society, or Frankensteins monster fan club.
Absolutely disgusting, why should TAXpayers of ALL religions have to pay for 'religious projects' Religion is the cause of all war, suffering & hatred! Not that I'd want it to go to mosques etc, but you get the jist
sparro says...
10:40am Sat 19 May 12