Developer turns down cash plan (From The Oxford Times)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Developer turns down cash plan
6:10pm Wednesday 18th July 2012 in Oxford
By Oliver Evans, covering Banbury. Call me on 01865 425271
Colin Cook
A DEVELOPER has refused to give any cash for affordable housing in the latest twist over plans for a 1901 coal house in Oxford city centre.
Councillors previously hit out at Cantay Investments for putting forward a scheme for nine flats at the site behindCantay House off Park End Street.
This means it just misses a council policy that developments of 10 units or more must make half the homes available as affordable housing. So instead, councillors suggested the firm give cash to spend on affordable housing elsewhere in the city.
But it has refused this as well. Cantay bosses said it could not afford to give the cash, though this has been disputed by an Oxford City Council planning officer. It is the latest twist in a saga over housing at the prominent town centre site, behind Conference Centre Oxford.
The scheme was approved by the west area planning committee in December but has now been “called in” by councillors over the affordable housing issue. Executive board member for city development Colin Cook said: “It is my contention this site is perfectly capable of taking 10 flats.”
A viability assessment which Cantay says shows it does not need to give cash had not been carried out correctly, a report by council planning officers says.
This works by subtracting the sale value of homes from the costs of building a scheme.
If this “residual land value” number is greater than the value of its existing use then the scheme is said to be viable.
But the report says Cantay compared this number to the value of site for student flats, which it also has permission, and not the standard housing residential value.
The report says: “They were not comparing like with like. Evidence submitted is not clear or robust and officers are not satisfied that a departure from the policy position is justified.”
They recommend the entire plan for nine flats be refused and it will be debated by the council's planning review committee on July 25.
The scheme for 45 student flats on the site was approved in January despite concerns it would add to anti-social behaviour.
A Cantay spokesman would not comment on the move.
Comments(9)
Andrew:Oxford
says...
7:04pm Wed 18 Jul 12
There may well be a significant amount of bluster and hot air on the part of the council, but they plan, and write the rules and they manage the planning permission. If they subsequently find that the rules and implementation fail to meet their own expectations - then they should know exactly who to blame.
(I look forward to a developer saying to OCC "Good news. We can squeeze another parking space in...")
Dilligaf2010
says...
7:30pm Wed 18 Jul 12
BigAlBiker
says...
9:35pm Wed 18 Jul 12
Don't you think the idea of 9 developments was deliberate? Don't you think the builders know the planning laws and on what grounds they can apply for permission and the fact that even if the council turn down planning permission they will get it
Cookie get your head out of your rear end and do something useful like the job your paid to do.
BigAlBiker
says...
9:35pm Wed 18 Jul 12
Don't you think the idea of 9 developments was deliberate? Don't you think the builders know the planning laws and on what grounds they can apply for permission and the fact that even if the council turn down planning permission they will get it
Cookie get your head out of your rear end and do something useful like the job your paid to do.
Sid Hunt
says...
8:03am Thu 19 Jul 12
This looks like another incompetent episode for the city council.
Myron Blatz
says...
9:49am Thu 19 Jul 12
icba1957
says...
9:53am Thu 19 Jul 12
Unfortunately, I live in Abingdon, where they're just as bad!
sparky123456
says...
2:02pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Feelingsmatter says...
6:26pm Wed 18 Jul 12