Councils pay top officers over £4m (From The Oxford Times)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Councils pay top officers over £4m
10:20am Wednesday 25th April 2012 in Oxfordshire
By Tom Jennings, covering Witney and West Oxfordshire. Call me on 01865 425403
COUNCILS in Oxfordshire paid out more than £4m in salary packages for senior officers last year, new figures show.
The TaxPayers’ Alliance also revealed last night there were 32 council officers in Oxfordshire whose wages, pension contributions and expenses came to more than £100,000 each in 2010/11.
The total cost of directors at the county and district councils comes to £4,321,881, the alliance figures show.
It called for council executives to take a pay cut so they had the “moral authority” to make spending cuts.
However the figures did show the directors had not been awarded large pay rises.
Oxfordshire County Council spent a total of £2,834,080 paying 21 remuneration packages that were more than £100,000.
Chief executive Joanna Simons’ package was £217,640, including a £182,431 salary and £35,209 in pension contributions.
Spokesman Owen Morton said senior staff members had not received a pay rise since 2008. The council had reduced the number of senior managers by 40 per cent since 2010.
Oxford City Council chief executive Peter Sloman’s package was £168,280 – £140,000 in salary, fees and allowances and £28,280 in pension contributions.
Three other senior executives also received more than £100,000.
Spokesman Louisa Dean said the council had saved more than £4m in the past year and this would not have been possible without attracting top staff.
West Oxfordshire District Council chief executive David Neudegg picked up a £101,691 salary in his total package of £145,744.
South Oxfordshire District Council and Vale of White Horse District Council share the cost of their top officers.
The councils’ chief executive David Buckle earned £129,092 in salary, plus £1,115 expenses and £21,300 pension contributions to total £151,507. The chief finance officer’s package was £123,213.
Councillor Matthew Barber said splitting the remunerations bill had saved money.
Cherwell District Council chief executive Sue Smith’s made her package of £112,420, from a £81,458 salary, £5,917 in fees, £6,310 in expenses and a pension of £18,691.
She was the only officer to receive more than £100,000 in the council, which shares costs with South Northamptonshire Council.
Commenting on the city’s packages, Ms Dean said the council could not have achieved recent savings “without attracting an able and dedicated top team.”
TaxPayers’ Alliance chief executive Matthew Elliott said: “Taxpayers will be astonished so many council employees are still getting such a generous deal while everyone else in the public sector is facing a pay freeze.”
Comments(13)
A34North
says...
11:03am Wed 25 Apr 12
Says who, you Louisa? That old fallacy is now well worn and so untrue in this day and age.
Dilligaf2010
says...
12:00pm Wed 25 Apr 12
......When they're on that kind of money, they shouldn't get a pay rise until at least 2018.
Something that I'm struggling to believe, is that I agree with A34North, if the pay of the Top Executives was halved, and the jobs re-advertised there'd still be plenty of worthy applicants.
Too many corporations are claiming they have to pay huge salaries to get the right staff, that's utter trash, just because somebody is on a huge salary, and wants an even bigger one to switch jobs, it doesn't mean they're the best, it just means they're greedy, and their previous employers have been gullible.
What these councils have been paying though, is ridiculous, making pension contributions of 4 times what some people earn, is criminal.
wizardofox2
says...
1:57pm Wed 25 Apr 12
Inkpot
says...
4:04pm Wed 25 Apr 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
5:18pm Wed 25 Apr 12
Inkpot wrote:Strange that, Politicians do the same....the tax payer pays their salaries, but has no say on how much they're entitled to, something smells....
The biggest problem is that the councillors vote for their own pay packages thereby avoiding any need to consult with their constituents.
aet123
says...
6:42pm Wed 25 Apr 12
Now that would be funny if it wasn't so tragic. Trying telling that to the ordinary workers who have lost their jobs through cuts. Or the services that have been lost or privatised or cut. Never mind, so long as everyone important gets there 'going rate' in their salary each month!
wizardofox2
says...
7:19pm Wed 25 Apr 12
L0RD PETER MCVEY 0X2 6EG
says...
8:41pm Wed 25 Apr 12
Iain L
says...
8:36am Thu 26 Apr 12
Inkpot wrote:Councillors don't get paid - they receive an allowance mainly focused at meeting out of pocket expenses and for senior posts offsetting lost income for time spent on council work.
The biggest problem is that the councillors vote for their own pay packages thereby avoiding any need to consult with their constituents.
For example as a town councillor I estimate I spend at least a day a week on council business, not to mention any out of pocket expenses. The annual allowance is a little under £800 pa.
This translates to £1.60 a day. I repeat my point from previous posts - councillors are not 'in it for the money', there are a huge number of easier ways of earning £1.60 a day!
Abberdon
says...
9:26am Thu 26 Apr 12
Jonjo01
says...
1:50pm Thu 26 Apr 12
Dark-Warrior
says...
6:44am Fri 27 Apr 12
someguyfromhereandthere says...
10:30am Wed 25 Apr 12