Grant bid for station car park plan

Councillor Colin Dingwall Councillor Colin Dingwall

PLANS have been put forward by First Great Western to build a new 197-space car park close to Hanborough railway station.

The station’s 50-space car park is often full by 6.45am and dozens of drivers park on the grass verges along the A4095 and outside nearby residents’ homes.

FGW is seeking funding for the car park on a nearby former plant hire depot, next to North Oxford Garage’s Mini showroom and body shop.

Blenheim Estates purchased the site, off the A4095 Main Road, formerly owned by Hewden, in March and is in discussions with FGW about converting it into a car park.

But the plan hinges on FGW securing a grant from a Network Rail station improvement fund, which is expected be decided at a meeting on May 10.

If the scheme does go ahead, drivers would be charged to use the station’s car parking spaces, with the county council putting no-waiting restrictions in place on nearby roads and the verges.

Colin Dingwall, West Oxfordshire District Council member for Freeland and Hanborough, has been working on finding a solution to the parking problem for three years.

He said: “It is of the utmost importance. The situation down there is dangerous and is a tremendous nuisance for all the people who live in the area.

“It is also a nuisance for all the people who want to travel by train to relieve the congested roads.”

Mr Dingwall is also working on a scheme to build a housing development in a field alongside the railway line, which would combine affordable housing with a 100-space car park for rail users.

Cotswold Line Promotion Group Hanborough representative Andrew Wilkins said: “I’ve counted more than 70 cars parked along the A4095, which is very annoying for residents but also creates a danger with cars backing out on to the road.”

The number of passengers using Hanborough station has grown by almost 50 per cent since 2005, from 70,500 journeys starting or ending there in 2005-6 to 104,000 journeys in 2009-10.

FGW spokesman James Davis said: “For customers to make the most of the services that First Great Western offers, providing suitable parking facilities can only be of benefit.”

Blenheim Estates property director Roger File said: “We have acquired the Hewden site as a commercial investment.

“We have a number of options, one of which is to do something with Network Rail, subject to their grant coming through.

“We would rather help solve the traffic problems than something that does not offer that benefit.”

The change of use would need to gain planning permission from West Oxfordshire District Council.

tjennings@oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(9)

L0RD PETER MCVEY 0X2 6EG says...
5:27pm Mon 23 Apr 12

WE PAY, FGW GAINS. What a surprise. You want a car park, pay for it out of the money you make from your vastly profiteering fares that you charge us. Otherwise this land should be used for housing.

Phian says...
5:37pm Mon 23 Apr 12

This Car Park would be good news. I'm surprised there has not been a really bad accident during dark evenings with cars being reversed onto the road. It is usual for car parking to be charged for at Rail Stations so this is not unreasonable in my opinion.

L0RD PETER MCVEY 0X2 6EG says...
7:45pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Phian wrote:
This Car Park would be good news. I'm surprised there has not been a really bad accident during dark evenings with cars being reversed onto the road. It is usual for car parking to be charged for at Rail Stations so this is not unreasonable in my opinion.
The point I am making is that why should WE pay for FGW to own more land.

Phian says...
9:54pm Mon 23 Apr 12

"WE" covers a lot of people, can you narrow it down a bit ?
The plan hinges on FGW securing a grant from a Network Rail station improvement fund.

Porphyro says...
10:27pm Mon 23 Apr 12

When a politician or a charlatan misappropriates the word "we", he's probably spouting nonsense again.

Why should rail passengers in general pay for the provision of car parking at stations? Make the motorists pay. I offer this opinion as a user of Hanborough station who gets there by car.

John Charles says...
8:40am Tue 24 Apr 12

The money comes from you and me -- the Network Rail fund is financed by the Government. I reckon if that most or all of these spaces are taken 5 days a week and some at weekends FGW will make at least £250,000 a year in parking fees and possibly a lot more. So why should the general public help fund a private train company? They already get massive Government subsidies and, despite that, have the UK's worst record for overcrowding on peak-time services.

West Oxon Webwatcher says...
11:07am Tue 24 Apr 12

This OM report is not correct. The bid is not for a grant but for the finance to actually construct the car park. The car park, as is correctly reported, would still be owned by Blenheim Estates who would receive a rent. The necessary car park charges would have to pay for, that rent, the debt charges on the capital investment to construct the car park and the inevitable recurring costs of running, managaing and maintaining the car park. There would therefore be no subsidy from taxpayers or other rail users.

Porphyro says...
11:22am Tue 24 Apr 12

Thanks, West Oxon Webwatcher, for a helpfully informative response that makes a pleasant change from the shouting-the-mouth-o
ff misinformation and misguided comment that some regular contributors serve up.

L0RD PETER MCVEY 0X2 6EG says...
4:40pm Tue 24 Apr 12

West Oxon Webwatcher wrote:
This OM report is not correct. The bid is not for a grant but for the finance to actually construct the car park. The car park, as is correctly reported, would still be owned by Blenheim Estates who would receive a rent. The necessary car park charges would have to pay for, that rent, the debt charges on the capital investment to construct the car park and the inevitable recurring costs of running, managaing and maintaining the car park. There would therefore be no subsidy from taxpayers or other rail users.
And when the costs have been recovered FGW will lower parking fees to rent only costs. Methinks not and Mr Charles comment will be 100% correct. FGW want to make money, then like any other business they should invest themselves instead of looking at public money to boost the divs to the shareholders. But then again FGW are great a passing the buck when things go wrong.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree