Sir - The correspondence kicked-off by Jeremy Clarkson's article (Report, December 1) is really about causation, that is, the identification of the link between road layouts, speed restrictions etc on the one hand and, on the other, a sufficiently wide sample of data (including, but not limited to, accidents) from which to draw conclusions.
Causation is complicated stuff, requiring thought and analysis of competing contributions to events. "Ban" and "spend" are much easier concepts.
No need to think, no complicated differentiating between "hazard" and "risk", just impose a speed limit, fiddle around with the road layout, and write a cheque.
Then, the next time a negligent bus driver hits a cyclist or a grossly negligent mother veers across the carriageway or a thoughtless student wanders across the lanes at a roundabout, the highways officers can say "it was not my fault". This back-covering has become the main driver for highways officers' activities. It wastes money and distorts priorities. We must get some thinking back into road planning.
Chris Dale, Oxford
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article