Road closure for railway work prompts planning plea

The Oxford Times: Road closure for railway work prompts planning plea Road closure for railway work prompts planning plea

A PLAN to shut off a major traffic route in the Vale of White Horse needs better planning, a council leader has warned.

Drivers are facing months of serious delays as the A338 between Wantage and Oxford is due to be closed for up to six months while Network Rail electrifies the Didcot to Swindon main line.

Vale of White Horse District Council is now pushing for clear plans to be put in place to ensure the local economy, residents, and commuters are not badly hit by the works.

From next month, the road will be closed for Network Rail to raise the Station Road bridge at the closed Volunteer pub near Grove.

The next quickest route available to motorists travelling to Oxford or Abingdon would be by taking the A34 as far as the Milton interchange, near Didcot.

The district council has said the work could result in motorists being required to take up to an 18-mile detour, with cyclists facing a diversion of up to six miles.

Council leader Matthew Barber said: “Motorists and users of public transport in the Vale already experience significant delays to their journey on a regular basis.

“Unless a robust plan is put in place during the electrification work, including the installation of a temporary bridge, we are going to have major problems which would significantly affect many people living and working across the district.”

The work is part of Network Rail’s £1bn electrification scheme, installing overhead wires to power trains on the Great Western main line from London to Bristol by 2016. A total of 27 bridges in the county will need to be raised.

Oxfordshire County Council, the highways authority, has received plans from Network Rail to close the A338 for six months and is considering the application.

Council spokesman Martin Crabtree said: “The county council has not yet received a formal application from Network Rail to close the A338 for six months. We are still considering the situation and will be working with Network Rail to see if alternative options are available which would work better for road users and the local community.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:34pm Fri 3 Jan 14

downsview says...

Build a new bridge before the old bridge is removed Simple!
Build a new bridge before the old bridge is removed Simple! downsview
  • Score: -77

6:24pm Mon 27 Jan 14

CtrlAltTab says...

downsview wrote:
Build a new bridge before the old bridge is removed Simple!
At what cost? Not simple!
I travel over this bridge everyday, before the main traffic builds up around 7:30 onwards without much hassle, so why not leave early to get where you need via a different route?
I agree something better has to happen, but a new bridge?? also means new road, new infrastructure etc. the cost will spiral out of control, and people will only start moaning about how much it cost.

If it needs done, get it done, moaning about it will not stop it from happening, what ever happened to the British spirit?
[quote][p][bold]downsview[/bold] wrote: Build a new bridge before the old bridge is removed Simple![/p][/quote]At what cost? Not simple! I travel over this bridge everyday, before the main traffic builds up around 7:30 onwards without much hassle, so why not leave early to get where you need via a different route? I agree something better has to happen, but a new bridge?? also means new road, new infrastructure etc. the cost will spiral out of control, and people will only start moaning about how much it cost. If it needs done, get it done, moaning about it will not stop it from happening, what ever happened to the British spirit? CtrlAltTab
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree