Christians’ bus challenge to atheist (From The Oxford Times)

• "Why should Mr. Dawkins "debate" such an obsessive, smug self-publicist with no actual arguments - but just a bag full of rhetoric and philosophical fallacies, and a convincing presentational technique? Dr. Craig would make a very good second-hand car salesman.
  
  Have any of you actually listened to Dr. Craig's "arguments"? They are painfully lacking in any kind of coherence, and are based on false premises and cod philosophical constructs that do not prove or assert anything. He is also guilty of special pleading with regard to his main defence of a "caused cause" - the Kalam Cosmological Argument.
  
  Anybody who wants evidence of Dr. Craig's shoddy arguments ought to seek out his debate with Cambridge philosopher Arif Ahmed. Ahmed utterly humiliated Craig in this "debate" by actually deconstructing his arguments and fallacies. I take my hat off to Arif for having the patience to do this, but I imagine Mr. Dawkins doesn't have the patience to go through such a laborious process.
  
  Anybody going to these "debates" had better keep in mind that reality has nothing to do with presentation style or rhetoric. If you do keep this in mind, you will find Dr. Craig's "arguments" are completely meaningless. This is something that an increasing number of people are realising."
• * Your name This field is mandatory
• * Your email This field is mandatory
• Reason

  Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

• 
  Enter the above word in the box below
  
  

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.